From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: mlx4_core 0000:07:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full and OOM observed during stress test on reset_controller Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:48:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20170308154815.GB24437@lst.de> References: <1908657724.31179983.1488539944957.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <2013049462.31187009.1488542111040.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20170305081206.GI14379@mtr-leonro.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170305081206.GI14379-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Yi Zhang , linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Why is that system using swiotlb? mlx4 really doesn't have any weird addressing limits, does it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html