From: Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: benve-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
dgoodell-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
monis-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] {net,IB}/{rxe,usnic}: Utilize generic mac to eui32 function
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:33:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170310163346.GB14379@mtr-leonro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308134856.GA4828@yuval-lap>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5751 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:48:57PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:31:58PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> > > This logic seems to be duplicated in (at least) three separate files.
> > > Move it to one place so code can be re-use.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > > v0 -> v1:
> > > * Add missing #include
> > > * Rename to genaddrconf_ifid_eui48
> > > v1 -> v2:
> > > * Reset eui[0] to default if dev_id is used
> > > v2 -> v3:
> > > * Add helper function to avoid re-setting eui[0] to default if
> > > dev_id is used
> > > ---
> > > drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_common_util.h | 11 +++--------
> > > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c | 11 ++---------
> > > include/net/addrconf.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> > > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > Not promising statistics :)
>
> It is not fair, i also added 4 new blank lines :)
>
> >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_common_util.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_common_util.h
> > > index b54986d..d91b035 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_common_util.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_common_util.h
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> > > #ifndef USNIC_CMN_UTIL_H
> > > #define USNIC_CMN_UTIL_H
> > >
> > > +#include <net/addrconf.h>
> > > +
> > > static inline void
> > > usnic_mac_to_gid(const char *const mac, char *raw_gid)
> > > {
> > > @@ -57,14 +59,7 @@ usnic_mac_ip_to_gid(const char *const mac, const __be32 inaddr, char *raw_gid)
> > > raw_gid[1] = 0x80;
> > > memset(&raw_gid[2], 0, 2);
> > > memcpy(&raw_gid[4], &inaddr, 4);
> > > - raw_gid[8] = mac[0]^2;
> > > - raw_gid[9] = mac[1];
> > > - raw_gid[10] = mac[2];
> > > - raw_gid[11] = 0xff;
> > > - raw_gid[12] = 0xfe;
> > > - raw_gid[13] = mac[3];
> > > - raw_gid[14] = mac[4];
> > > - raw_gid[15] = mac[5];
> > > + addrconf_addr_eui48(&raw_gid[8], mac);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
> > > index d8610960..ab8ea23 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
> > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> > > #include <net/udp_tunnel.h>
> > > #include <net/sch_generic.h>
> > > +#include <net/addrconf.h>
> > > #include <linux/netfilter.h>
> > > #include <rdma/ib_addr.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -86,18 +87,10 @@ struct rxe_recv_sockets recv_sockets;
> > >
> > > static __be64 rxe_mac_to_eui64(struct net_device *ndev)
> > > {
> >
> > It is worth to drop this wrapper completely. The rxe_mac_to_eui64 is
> > called twice in the same file.
>
> hmmm, this is a classic wrapper to adapt an existing API signature to
> usage. And in this case to return __be64 from existing function which
> returns void.
>
> What we can do is the opposite - get rid of rxe_node_guid and rxe_port_guid
> and call directly to rxe_mac_to_eui64. This is based on the assumption that
> node_guid and port_guid are the same in Soft RoCE.
> What do you think?
As long as you will add a meaningful comment in these places.
Right now, the knowledge of node_guid == port_guid in RXE is very clear,
it is worth to preserve it (knowledge).
>
> >
> > > - unsigned char *mac_addr = ndev->dev_addr;
> > > __be64 eui64;
> > > unsigned char *dst = (unsigned char *)&eui64;
> > >
> > > - dst[0] = mac_addr[0] ^ 2;
> > > - dst[1] = mac_addr[1];
> > > - dst[2] = mac_addr[2];
> > > - dst[3] = 0xff;
> > > - dst[4] = 0xfe;
> > > - dst[5] = mac_addr[3];
> > > - dst[6] = mac_addr[4];
> > > - dst[7] = mac_addr[5];
> > > + addrconf_addr_eui48(dst, ndev->dev_addr);
> > >
> > > return eui64;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/include/net/addrconf.h b/include/net/addrconf.h
> > > index 17c6fd8..28274ed 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/addrconf.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/addrconf.h
> > > @@ -103,12 +103,25 @@ int addrconf_prefix_rcv_add_addr(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
> > > u32 addr_flags, bool sllao, bool tokenized,
> > > __u32 valid_lft, u32 prefered_lft);
> > >
> > > +static inline void addrconf_addr_eui48_xor(u8 *eui, const char *const addr, bool xor)
> > > +{
> > > + memcpy(eui, addr, 3);
> > > + if (xor)
> > > + eui[0] ^= 2;
> > > + eui[3] = 0xFF;
> > > + eui[4] = 0xFE;
> > > + memcpy(eui + 5, addr + 3, 3);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void addrconf_addr_eui48(u8 *eui, const char *const addr)
> > > +{
> > > + addrconf_addr_eui48_xor(eui, addr, true);
> >
> > Just put your "eui[0] ^= 2" here and remove redundant "if (xor)".
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline int addrconf_ifid_eui48(u8 *eui, struct net_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > if (dev->addr_len != ETH_ALEN)
> > > return -1;
> > > - memcpy(eui, dev->dev_addr, 3);
> > > - memcpy(eui + 5, dev->dev_addr + 3, 3);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * The zSeries OSA network cards can be shared among various
> > > @@ -123,14 +136,14 @@ static inline int addrconf_ifid_eui48(u8 *eui, struct net_device *dev)
> > > * case. Hence the resulting interface identifier has local
> > > * scope according to RFC2373.
> > > */
> > > +
> > > + addrconf_addr_eui48_xor(eui, dev->dev_addr, !dev->dev_id);
> > > +
> > > if (dev->dev_id) {
> > > eui[3] = (dev->dev_id >> 8) & 0xFF;
> > > eui[4] = dev->dev_id & 0xFF;
> > > - } else {
> > > - eui[3] = 0xFF;
> > > - eui[4] = 0xFE;
> > > - eui[0] ^= 2;
> >
> > Leave this line.
>
> Along with the above comment - looks better, will do.
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > > }
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-10 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-07 19:31 [PATCH v3] {net,IB}/{rxe,usnic}: Utilize generic mac to eui32 function Yuval Shaia
2017-03-08 7:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-03-08 13:48 ` Yuval Shaia
2017-03-10 16:33 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170310163346.GB14379@mtr-leonro.local \
--to=leon-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=benve-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dgoodell-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=monis-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox