public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* rdma-core: ​libibumad symbols version downgrade
@ 2017-04-18 17:55 Benjamin Drung
       [not found] ` <1492538111.18372.1.camel-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Drung @ 2017-04-18 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: List Linux RDMA Mailing

Hi,

while reviewing the Debian packaging changes from libibumad
1.3.10.2-2 to rdma-core, I stumbled over the symbols version.
libibumad 1.3.10.2 ships libibumad.so.3.1.0, but rdma-core
ships libibumad.so.3.0.14 which is lower. Is that intentional?

-- 
Benjamin Drung
System Developer
Debian & Ubuntu Developer

ProfitBricks GmbH
Greifswalder Str. 207
D - 10405 Berlin

Email: benjamin.drung-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org
URL:  http://www.profitbricks.com

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin.
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 125506B.
Geschäftsführer: Andreas Gauger, Achim Weiss.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: rdma-core: ​libibumad symbols version downgrade
       [not found] ` <1492538111.18372.1.camel-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-04-19 10:04   ` Leon Romanovsky
       [not found]     ` <20170419100430.GI14088-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2017-04-19 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Drung; +Cc: List Linux RDMA Mailing

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 07:55:11PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while reviewing the Debian packaging changes from libibumad
> 1.3.10.2-2 to rdma-core, I stumbled over the symbols version.
> libibumad 1.3.10.2 ships libibumad.so.3.1.0, but rdma-core
> ships libibumad.so.3.0.14 which is lower. Is that intentional?

I don't think so. It should be 3.1.${PACKAGE_VERSION}.

Thanks

>
> --
> Benjamin Drung
> System Developer
> Debian & Ubuntu Developer
>
> ProfitBricks GmbH
> Greifswalder Str. 207
> D - 10405 Berlin
>
> Email: benjamin.drung-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org
> URL:  http://www.profitbricks.com
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin.
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 125506B.
> Geschäftsführer: Andreas Gauger, Achim Weiss.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: rdma-core: ​libibumad symbols version downgrade
       [not found]     ` <20170419100430.GI14088-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-04-19 15:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2017-04-19 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Romanovsky; +Cc: Benjamin Drung, List Linux RDMA Mailing

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:04:30PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 07:55:11PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while reviewing the Debian packaging changes from libibumad
> > 1.3.10.2-2 to rdma-core, I stumbled over the symbols version.
> > libibumad 1.3.10.2 ships libibumad.so.3.1.0, but rdma-core
> > ships libibumad.so.3.0.14 which is lower. Is that intentional?

It was intentional:

commit 232796a623f28bd205d15acac44bb007b8fc64be
Author: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Mon Jan 30 11:04:21 2017 -0700

    Fix shared library filenames
    
    We expect the filename to reflect the symbol versions in the file,
    this means, eg libibverbs1.3 should have the IBVERBS_1.3 as the newest
    symbol. The same applies to all libraries.
    
    verbs was not updated in commit 3ca7a103148 when new symbols were added
    
    umad/rdmacm probably legitimately had a '.1' someday, but failed to
    follow symver convention. Bump it back down.
    
    Since distros are not using it in packaging the shared library version
    and filename is no longer used by anything. We simply want it to follow
    our own internal conventions.
    
    Fixes: 3ca7a1031486 ("ibverbs: Add support for packet pacing")
    Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-19 15:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-18 17:55 rdma-core: ​libibumad symbols version downgrade Benjamin Drung
     [not found] ` <1492538111.18372.1.camel-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 10:04   ` Leon Romanovsky
     [not found]     ` <20170419100430.GI14088-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 15:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox