From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:43:43 -0600 Message-ID: <20170612164343.GA12435@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20170612064918.12510-1-leon@kernel.org> <1497281280.2770.1.camel@wdc.com> <20170612162917.GA11993@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Parav Pandit Cc: Bart Van Assche , "leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Idan Burstein List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:42:27PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > I would suggest at least using the inverted sense like Bart describes in the > > kernel - every kernel ULP is safe. > I don't see a need to use inverted sense in code. I can surely make documentation more descriptive as Bart suggested. If this is 'better' then it should be on as much as possible, and I certianly don't want to see kernel ULPs query caps and other pointless things when they already, necessarily, deal with out of order. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html