Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement

Jason Gunthorpe
2017-06-12T16:43:43Z

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:42:27PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:

> > I would suggest at least using the inverted sense like Bart describes in the
> > kernel - every kernel ULP is safe.

> I don't see a need to use inverted sense in code. I can surely make documentation more descriptive as Bart suggested.

If this is 'better' then it should be on as much as possible, and I
certianly don't want to see kernel ULPs query caps and other pointless
things when they already, necessarily, deal with out of order.

Jason