RE: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement

Parav Pandit
2017-06-12T16:53:28Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 11:44 AM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>; leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org;
> dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; Idan Burstein
> <idanb-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/3] Support out of order data placement
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:42:27PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
> > > I would suggest at least using the inverted sense like Bart
> > > describes in the kernel - every kernel ULP is safe.
>
> > I don't see a need to use inverted sense in code. I can surely make
> documentation more descriptive as Bart suggested.
>
> If this is 'better' then it should be on as much as possible, and I certianly
> don't want to see kernel ULPs query caps and other pointless things when
> they already, necessarily, deal with out of order.

Sure. Kernel ULPs and any other user ULPs can skip query caps.

>
> Jason