From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chien Tin Tung Subject: Re: [rdma-next 01/33] Revert "IB/core: Add flow control to the portmapper netlink calls" Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:38:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20170801133832.GA11812@ctung-MOBL3.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20170801120536.540-1-leon@kernel.org> <20170801120536.540-2-leon@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170801120536.540-2-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Doug Ledford , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Leon Romanovsky List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:05:04PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky > > The commit cea05eadded0 ("IB/core: Add flow control to the portmapper netlink calls") > changed netlink to be blocked for all RDMA clients. This workaround > worked perfectly for portmapper, but is not correct for the whole > NETLINK_RDMA family. Leon, I've already told you I'm opposed to the revert. There is a patch that will work with your usage of ibnl_unicast() but you chose to abandon that discussion on June 29, 2017 (RDMA/core: Add wait/retry version of ibnl_unicast). Either you step up with good sound technical evidence to convince me that patch won't work for you or you stop trying to break existing functionality with this revert. Chien -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html