From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] RDMA/cma: Remove netlink interface of CMA statistics Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:24:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20171113192432.GL6918@ziepe.ca> References: <20171113144024.26655-1-leon@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171113144024.26655-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Doug Ledford , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Parav Pandit , Leon Romanovsky List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:40:24PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky > > CMA statistics were exposed to users through netlink interface long time > ago, but it wasn't exposed using netlink extensibility approach. The > current implementation was based on struct and not attributes. > > Let's remove it, before anyone is actually start to use it and prevents us > to write it properly. You should describe why you think it is safe to remove a uAPI from the kernel in the commit message.. When was it introduced? Why was a uAPI added with no users?? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html