Re: rdma-core stable releases

[Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1379 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:27:40AM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
>
>
> Le 13/11/2017 à 08:08, Leon Romanovsky a écrit :
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 08:01:48AM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: >> >> >> Le 10/11/2017 à 22:14, Jason Gunthorpe a écrit : >>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:24:55PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >>>> More or less, you wrote everything that I expected, just need to post it >>>> as a patch so I can apply it to rdma-core. >>> Also please describe how to get patches into -stable, eg similar to >>> the kernel, mark with fixes and cc the stable maintainer. >>> >>> There should also be absolutely no ABI changes in the -stable branchs. >> >> Agreed. Ideally we would add something to CI so that it detects ABI breake on stable branches. >> I know SUSE has something like this for maintenance fixes. I'll look into it. > > DPDK runs ABI compliance checker. > http://ispras.linuxbase.org/index.php/ABI_compliance_checker > > I would love to see it running for rdma-core. > > Thanks >
> Got the scripts ready for this BUT the versions available in docker of abi-dump/abi-compliance-checker are not compatible.
> As both are GPLv2, could I import them into buildlib ?

I'm not a lawyer,
Our dual license policy is relevant for source code and build scripts only. The tools for our CI can be GPLv2-only.

Thanks

>
> Nicolas
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]