RE: [PATCH v3 0/4] ibacm: acmp retry issues

Ruhl, Michael J
2017-11-14T19:10:45Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Romanovsky [mailto:leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 1:46 PM
> To: Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] ibacm: acmp retry issues
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:43:00AM -0500, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> > While testing the retry mechanism for the acmp provider, I observed
> > that the retry event_wait() did not appear to be working correctly.
> > After studying the issue a bit more, I discovered that there were a
> > couple of issues.
> >
> > This patch set addresses those issues.
> >
> > v2 - added patch for MONOTONIC time base
> > v3 - Updated and cleaned various type cast issues
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Michael J. Ruhl (4):
> > ibacm: Fix an incorrect expiration check for the retry timer
> > ibacm: Calculate correct tv_nsec value in event_wait()
> > ibacm: Fix a retry loop calculation race condition
> > ibacm: Use MONOTONIC time base to avoid timer expiration issues
> >
> >
> > ibacm/linux/osd.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> > ibacm/prov/acmp/src/acmp.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Can you please use [PATCH rdma-core ..] format for rdma-core patches?

Hi Leon,

Yes, I will reformat.

Is there a place to put patch set version information? i.e [PATCH rdma-core v4, x/y]? (should I just drop it for this patch set?)

Thanks,

Mike

> We are using patchworks to handle queue and it is so handy to filter
> patches in such way:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?q=rdma-core
>
> Thanks
>
> > --
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html