* [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix request completion holes
@ 2017-11-20 10:41 Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-1-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2017-11-20 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
We have two holes in nvme-rdma when completing request.
1. We never wait for send work request to complete before completing
a request. It is possible that the HCA retries a send operation (due
to dropped ack) after the nvme cqe has already arrived back to the host.
If we unmap the host buffer upon reception of the cqe, the HCA might
get iommu errors when attempting to access an unmapped host buffer.
We must wait also for the send completion before completing a request,
most of the time it will be before the nvme cqe has arrived back so
we pay only for the extra cq entry processing.
2. We don't wait for the request memory region to be fully invalidated
in case the target didn't invalidate remotely. We must wait for the local
invalidation to complete before completing the request.
Note that we might face two concurrent completion processing contexts for
a single request. One is the ib_cq irq-poll context and the second is
blk_mq_poll which is invoked from IOCB_HIPRI requests. Thus we need the
completion flags updates (send/receive) to be atomic. A new request
lock is introduced to guarantee the mutual exclusion of the completion
flags updates.
Thanks to Christoph for suggesting request refcounts instead of a private
lock.
Changes from v2:
- Fixed send completion signalling in patch 1 (still signal conditionally
as we still want to suppress it for async events)
- replaced req->lock with req->ref for micro-optimization (Christoph)
Changes from v1:
- Added atomic send/resp_completed updated (via per-request lock)
Sagi Grimberg (3):
nvme-rdma: don't suppress send completions
nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has
completed
nvme-rdma: wait for local invalidation before completing a request
drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
--
2.14.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme-rdma: don't suppress send completions
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-1-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-11-20 10:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has completed Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme-rdma: wait for local invalidation before completing a request Sagi Grimberg
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2017-11-20 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
The entire completions suppress mechanism is currently
broken because the HCA might retry a send operation
(due to dropped ack) after the nvme transaction has completed.
In order to handle this, we signal all send completions (besides
async event which is not racing anything).
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 46 +++++++++-------------------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index fdd6659a09a0..85c98589a5e0 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ enum nvme_rdma_queue_flags {
struct nvme_rdma_queue {
struct nvme_rdma_qe *rsp_ring;
- atomic_t sig_count;
int queue_size;
size_t cmnd_capsule_len;
struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl;
@@ -510,7 +509,6 @@ static int nvme_rdma_alloc_queue(struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl,
queue->cmnd_capsule_len = sizeof(struct nvme_command);
queue->queue_size = queue_size;
- atomic_set(&queue->sig_count, 0);
queue->cm_id = rdma_create_id(&init_net, nvme_rdma_cm_handler, queue,
RDMA_PS_TCP, IB_QPT_RC);
@@ -1204,21 +1202,9 @@ static void nvme_rdma_send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
nvme_rdma_wr_error(cq, wc, "SEND");
}
-/*
- * We want to signal completion at least every queue depth/2. This returns the
- * largest power of two that is not above half of (queue size + 1) to optimize
- * (avoid divisions).
- */
-static inline bool nvme_rdma_queue_sig_limit(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue)
-{
- int limit = 1 << ilog2((queue->queue_size + 1) / 2);
-
- return (atomic_inc_return(&queue->sig_count) & (limit - 1)) == 0;
-}
-
static int nvme_rdma_post_send(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
struct nvme_rdma_qe *qe, struct ib_sge *sge, u32 num_sge,
- struct ib_send_wr *first, bool flush)
+ struct ib_send_wr *first, bool signal)
{
struct ib_send_wr wr, *bad_wr;
int ret;
@@ -1234,24 +1220,7 @@ static int nvme_rdma_post_send(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
wr.sg_list = sge;
wr.num_sge = num_sge;
wr.opcode = IB_WR_SEND;
- wr.send_flags = 0;
-
- /*
- * Unsignalled send completions are another giant desaster in the
- * IB Verbs spec: If we don't regularly post signalled sends
- * the send queue will fill up and only a QP reset will rescue us.
- * Would have been way to obvious to handle this in hardware or
- * at least the RDMA stack..
- *
- * Always signal the flushes. The magic request used for the flush
- * sequencer is not allocated in our driver's tagset and it's
- * triggered to be freed by blk_cleanup_queue(). So we need to
- * always mark it as signaled to ensure that the "wr_cqe", which is
- * embedded in request's payload, is not freed when __ib_process_cq()
- * calls wr_cqe->done().
- */
- if (nvme_rdma_queue_sig_limit(queue) || flush)
- wr.send_flags |= IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
+ wr.send_flags = signal ? IB_SEND_SIGNALED : 0;
if (first)
first->next = ≀
@@ -1322,6 +1291,12 @@ static void nvme_rdma_submit_async_event(struct nvme_ctrl *arg)
ib_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, sqe->dma, sizeof(*cmd),
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ /*
+ * async events do not race with reply completions and don't
+ * contain inline data, thus are safe to suppress. so in order
+ * to avoid the complexity of detecting async event send completions
+ * in the hot path we simply suppress their send completions.
+ */
ret = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, &sge, 1, NULL, false);
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
}
@@ -1607,7 +1582,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
struct nvme_rdma_request *req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
struct nvme_rdma_qe *sqe = &req->sqe;
struct nvme_command *c = sqe->data;
- bool flush = false;
struct ib_device *dev;
blk_status_t ret;
int err;
@@ -1639,10 +1613,8 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
ib_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, sqe->dma,
sizeof(struct nvme_command), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
- if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_FLUSH)
- flush = true;
err = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, req->sge, req->num_sge,
- req->mr->need_inval ? &req->reg_wr.wr : NULL, flush);
+ req->mr->need_inval ? &req->reg_wr.wr : NULL, true);
if (unlikely(err)) {
nvme_rdma_unmap_data(queue, rq);
goto err;
--
2.14.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has completed
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-1-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme-rdma: don't suppress send completions Sagi Grimberg
@ 2017-11-20 10:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-3-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme-rdma: wait for local invalidation before completing a request Sagi Grimberg
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2017-11-20 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
In order to guarantee that the HCA will never get an access violation
(either from invalidated rkey or from iommu) when retrying a send
operation we must complete a request only when both send completion
and the nvme cqe has arrived. We need to set the send/recv completions
flags atomically because we might have more than a single context
accessing the request concurrently (one is cq irq-poll context and
the other is user-polling used in IOCB_HIPRI).
Only then we are safe to invalidate the rkey (if needed), unmap
the host buffers, and complete the IO.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index 85c98589a5e0..1692d2318abe 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ struct nvme_rdma_request {
struct nvme_request req;
struct ib_mr *mr;
struct nvme_rdma_qe sqe;
+ struct nvme_completion cqe;
+ refcount_t ref;
struct ib_sge sge[1 + NVME_RDMA_MAX_INLINE_SEGMENTS];
u32 num_sge;
int nents;
@@ -1162,6 +1164,7 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_data(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
req->num_sge = 1;
req->inline_data = false;
req->mr->need_inval = false;
+ refcount_set(&req->ref, 2); /* send and recv completions */
c->common.flags |= NVME_CMD_SGL_METABUF;
@@ -1198,8 +1201,19 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_data(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
static void nvme_rdma_send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
- if (unlikely(wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS))
+ struct nvme_rdma_qe *qe =
+ container_of(wc->wr_cqe, struct nvme_rdma_qe, cqe);
+ struct nvme_rdma_request *req =
+ container_of(qe, struct nvme_rdma_request, sqe);
+ struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(req);
+
+ if (unlikely(wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS)) {
nvme_rdma_wr_error(cq, wc, "SEND");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref))
+ nvme_end_request(rq, req->cqe.status, req->cqe.result);
}
static int nvme_rdma_post_send(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
@@ -1318,14 +1332,19 @@ static int nvme_rdma_process_nvme_rsp(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
}
req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
- if (rq->tag == tag)
- ret = 1;
+ req->cqe.status = cqe->status;
+ req->cqe.result = cqe->result;
if ((wc->wc_flags & IB_WC_WITH_INVALIDATE) &&
wc->ex.invalidate_rkey == req->mr->rkey)
req->mr->need_inval = false;
- nvme_end_request(rq, cqe->status, cqe->result);
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref)) {
+ if (rq->tag == tag)
+ ret = 1;
+ nvme_end_request(rq, req->cqe.status, req->cqe.result);
+ }
+
return ret;
}
--
2.14.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme-rdma: wait for local invalidation before completing a request
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-1-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme-rdma: don't suppress send completions Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has completed Sagi Grimberg
@ 2017-11-20 10:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2017-11-20 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
We must not complete a request before the host memory region is
invalidated. Luckily we have send with invalidate protocol support
so we usually don't need to execute it, but in case the target
did not invalidate a memory region for us, we must wait for
the invalidation to complete before unmapping host memory and
completing the I/O.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index 1692d2318abe..a3802de0f248 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -1018,8 +1018,18 @@ static void nvme_rdma_memreg_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
static void nvme_rdma_inv_rkey_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
- if (unlikely(wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS))
+ struct nvme_rdma_request *req =
+ container_of(wc->wr_cqe, struct nvme_rdma_request, reg_cqe);
+ struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(req);
+
+ if (unlikely(wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS)) {
nvme_rdma_wr_error(cq, wc, "LOCAL_INV");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref))
+ nvme_end_request(rq, req->cqe.status, req->cqe.result);
+
}
static int nvme_rdma_inv_rkey(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
@@ -1030,7 +1040,7 @@ static int nvme_rdma_inv_rkey(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
.opcode = IB_WR_LOCAL_INV,
.next = NULL,
.num_sge = 0,
- .send_flags = 0,
+ .send_flags = IB_SEND_SIGNALED,
.ex.invalidate_rkey = req->mr->rkey,
};
@@ -1044,24 +1054,12 @@ static void nvme_rdma_unmap_data(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
struct request *rq)
{
struct nvme_rdma_request *req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
- struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl = queue->ctrl;
struct nvme_rdma_device *dev = queue->device;
struct ib_device *ibdev = dev->dev;
- int res;
if (!blk_rq_bytes(rq))
return;
- if (req->mr->need_inval && test_bit(NVME_RDMA_Q_LIVE, &req->queue->flags)) {
- res = nvme_rdma_inv_rkey(queue, req);
- if (unlikely(res < 0)) {
- dev_err(ctrl->ctrl.device,
- "Queueing INV WR for rkey %#x failed (%d)\n",
- req->mr->rkey, res);
- nvme_rdma_error_recovery(queue->ctrl);
- }
- }
-
ib_dma_unmap_sg(ibdev, req->sg_table.sgl,
req->nents, rq_data_dir(rq) ==
WRITE ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
@@ -1150,6 +1148,8 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_sg_fr(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
sg->type = (NVME_KEY_SGL_FMT_DATA_DESC << 4) |
NVME_SGL_FMT_INVALIDATE;
+ refcount_inc(&req->ref);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1336,8 +1336,18 @@ static int nvme_rdma_process_nvme_rsp(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
req->cqe.result = cqe->result;
if ((wc->wc_flags & IB_WC_WITH_INVALIDATE) &&
- wc->ex.invalidate_rkey == req->mr->rkey)
+ wc->ex.invalidate_rkey == req->mr->rkey) {
req->mr->need_inval = false;
+ refcount_dec(&req->ref);
+ } else if (req->mr->need_inval) {
+ ret = nvme_rdma_inv_rkey(queue, req);
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
+ dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
+ "Queueing INV WR for rkey %#x failed (%d)\n",
+ req->mr->rkey, ret);
+ nvme_rdma_error_recovery(queue->ctrl);
+ }
+ }
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref)) {
if (rq->tag == tag)
--
2.14.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has completed
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-3-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-11-20 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20171120105324.GA31524-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-11-20 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sagi Grimberg
Cc: linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Christoph Hellwig
> + req->cqe.status = cqe->status;
> + req->cqe.result = cqe->result;
I think we'll need to do a memcpy of the whole CQE here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has completed
[not found] ` <20171120105324.GA31524-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-11-20 11:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-11-20 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sagi Grimberg
Cc: linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:53:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > + req->cqe.status = cqe->status;
> > + req->cqe.result = cqe->result;
>
> I think we'll need to do a memcpy of the whole CQE here.
Or we could just store the status and results fields in the
nvme_rdma_request.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-20 11:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-20 10:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix request completion holes Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-1-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme-rdma: don't suppress send completions Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has completed Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20171120104156.31344-3-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-20 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20171120105324.GA31524-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-20 11:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-20 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme-rdma: wait for local invalidation before completing a request Sagi Grimberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).