From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: introduce get_user_pages_longterm Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:31:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20171201163140.GJ7754@ziepe.ca> References: <20171130095323.ovrq2nenb6ztiapy@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130174201.stbpuye4gu5rxwkm@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130181741.2y5nyflyhqxg6y5p@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130190117.GF7754@ziepe.ca> <20171201101218.mxjyv4fc4cjwhf2o@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171201160204.GI7754@ziepe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Williams Cc: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Linux MM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 08:29:53AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > And maybe we should think about moving the rlimit accounting into this > > new function too someday? > > DAX pages are not accounted in any rlimit because they are statically > allocated reserved memory regions. I mean, unrelated to DAX, any user of get_user_pages_longterm should respect the memlock rlimit and that check is shared code. Jason