From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [v3,1/9] RDMA/core: Add implicit per-device completion queue pools Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:50:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20171211235044.GA32331@ziepe.ca> References: <20171108095742.25365-2-sagi@grimberg.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171108095742.25365-2-sagi-NQWnxTmZq1alnMjI0IkVqw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sagi Grimberg , Bart Van Assche Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig , Max Gurtuvoy List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:57:34AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Allow a ULP to ask the core to implicitly assign a completion > queue to a queue-pair based on a least-used search on a per-device > cq pools. The device CQ pools grow in a lazy fashion with every > QP creation. > > In addition, expose an affinity hint for a queue pair creation. > If passed, the core will attempt to attach a CQ with a completion > vector that is directed to the cpu core as the affinity hint > provided. > > Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg Sagi, Bart, Did we reach a conclusion on this? Is v3 the series to take, and should it all go through the RDMA tree? It looks like there are some missing acks for that?? I think there was also an unapplied comment from bart in the patchworks notes... Could you please add some commit messages when you resend it? Not sure I should be accepting such large commits with empty messages??? Thanks, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html