public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core] verbs: Remove comp_mask checks from verbs.h
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:42:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171221054216.GF2942@mtr-leonro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220231350.GA19130-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3908 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:13:50PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> In the case of ibv_create_cq_ex this duplicates a check already done
> by ibv_cmd_create_cq_ex.
>

Yes and no.

Yes, the analysis is right and it is should be fixed.
No, the ibv_cmd_create_cq_ex check is performed after we entered into
vctx->create_cq_ex(context, cq_attr) callback, which is translated into
mlx4_create_cq_ex and mlx5_create_cq_ex.

Both these functions are performing their checks of cq_attr->comp_mask,
but return different errno. I think that it is perfect timing to start
organize and unite our return errors. They should return the same errno.

mlx4:
470         if (cq_attr->comp_mask & ~CREATE_CQ_SUPPORTED_COMP_MASK) {
471                 errno = ENOTSUP;
472                 return NULL;
473         }
474
475         if (cq_attr->comp_mask & IBV_CQ_INIT_ATTR_MASK_FLAGS &&
476             cq_attr->flags & ~CREATE_CQ_SUPPORTED_FLAGS) {
477                 errno = ENOTSUP;
478                 return NULL;
479         }

mlx5:
365         if (cq_attr->comp_mask & ~CREATE_CQ_SUPPORTED_COMP_MASK) {
366                 mlx5_dbg(fp, MLX5_DBG_CQ,
367                          "Unsupported comp_mask for create_cq\n");
368                 errno = EINVAL;
369                 return NULL;
370         }

> In the case of ibv_queryrt_values_ex, there is no check in the function
> op, which is an ABI mistake. So move the check there.

ibv_queryrt_values_ex -> ibv_query_rt_values_ex

>
> comp_mask should never be tested in the inline trampolines to generate
> EINVAL as the inlines are part of the app and could be from a future
> libibverbs with an expanded comp_mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  libibverbs/verbs.h     | 8 --------
>  providers/mlx4/verbs.c | 3 +++
>  providers/mlx5/verbs.c | 3 +++
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> I missed these when reviewing the earlier patches, and now people are
> cargo-cult copying them into new APIs.
>
> diff --git a/libibverbs/verbs.h b/libibverbs/verbs.h
> index 775bad52601781..7b53a6f5dff51f 100644
> --- a/libibverbs/verbs.h
> +++ b/libibverbs/verbs.h
> @@ -1967,11 +1967,6 @@ struct ibv_cq_ex *ibv_create_cq_ex(struct ibv_context *context,
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>
> -	if (cq_attr->comp_mask & ~(IBV_CQ_INIT_ATTR_MASK_RESERVED - 1)) {
> -		errno = EINVAL;
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	return vctx->create_cq_ex(context, cq_attr);
>  }
>
> @@ -2200,9 +2195,6 @@ ibv_query_rt_values_ex(struct ibv_context *context,
>  	if (!vctx)
>  		return ENOSYS;
>
> -	if (values->comp_mask & ~(IBV_VALUES_MASK_RESERVED - 1))
> -		return EINVAL;
> -
>  	return vctx->query_rt_values(context, values);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/providers/mlx4/verbs.c b/providers/mlx4/verbs.c
> index ec02bd4642b2d2..0a4ed1fde001eb 100644
> --- a/providers/mlx4/verbs.c
> +++ b/providers/mlx4/verbs.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ int mlx4_query_rt_values(struct ibv_context *context,
>  	uint32_t comp_mask = 0;
>  	int err = 0;
>
> +	if (!check_comp_mask(values->comp_mask, IBV_VALUES_MASK_RAW_CLOCK))
> +		return EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (values->comp_mask & IBV_VALUES_MASK_RAW_CLOCK) {
>  		uint64_t cycles;
>
> diff --git a/providers/mlx5/verbs.c b/providers/mlx5/verbs.c
> index a3323fd47651a7..579c0f3402d54d 100644
> --- a/providers/mlx5/verbs.c
> +++ b/providers/mlx5/verbs.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ int mlx5_query_rt_values(struct ibv_context *context,
>  	uint32_t comp_mask = 0;
>  	int err = 0;
>
> +	if (!check_comp_mask(values->comp_mask, IBV_VALUES_MASK_RAW_CLOCK))
> +		return EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (values->comp_mask & IBV_VALUES_MASK_RAW_CLOCK) {
>  		uint64_t cycles;
>
> --
> 2.15.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-21  5:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-20 23:13 [PATCH rdma-core] verbs: Remove comp_mask checks from verbs.h Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found] ` <20171220231350.GA19130-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-21  5:42   ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20171221054216.GF2942-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-21 16:24       ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]         ` <20171221162442.GC20015-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-21 17:19           ` Leon Romanovsky
     [not found]             ` <20171221171947.GK2942-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-25 14:32               ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171221054216.GF2942@mtr-leonro.local \
    --to=leon-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jgg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=yishaih-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox