From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core] debian: Only run udevadm if the binary is available Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:26:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20171227202627.GH25436@ziepe.ca> References: <20171227104135.24391-1-benjamin.drung@profitbricks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171227104135.24391-1-benjamin.drung-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Benjamin Drung Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:41:35AM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > When udevadm is not available (e.g. in a minimal chroot environment), > the rdma-core package installation will print these warnings: > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/rdma-core.postinst: 33: > /var/lib/dpkg/info/rdma-core.postinst: udevadm: not found > /var/lib/dpkg/info/rdma-core.postinst: 34: > /var/lib/dpkg/info/rdma-core.postinst: udevadm: not found > /var/lib/dpkg/info/rdma-core.postinst: 35: > /var/lib/dpkg/info/rdma-core.postinst: udevadm: not found > > To silence these warnings, only run udevadm if this binary is available. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Drung > debian/rdma-core.postinst | 8 +++++--- > debian/srptools.postinst | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Hurm. Some packages have this which test, others do not.. I'm confused how we get to a state where rdma-core can be installed without udev? Virtually the entire purpose of that package revolves around udev and systemd ... So are we missing a dependency? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html