From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/4] vmw_pvrdma cleanup and style fixes Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 21:49:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20171228044931.GD5343@ziepe.ca> References: <20171220192305.GA28403@bryantan-devbox.prom.eng.vmware.com.prom.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171220192305.GA28403-qXbCdz4EeRo1jLI2hToXVI42T8aCTgcwy4vvyvUx+exJXi8ZT2ovy+oDBWuYMCC/JZORHMmSJCU@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bryan Tan Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:23:11AM -0800, Bryan Tan wrote: > Do some cleanup and fixes related to comments received when going > through the review process for the change to enable SRQs on vmw_pvrdma. > > Note, as there are dependencies on the 4.15 fixes, this patch series > is based on top of the for-rc fixes for 4.15. The patch series is > named "vmw_pvrdma fixes for 4.15" and the last commit of the series > is "RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Avoid use after free due to QP/CQ/SRQ destroy". > > Bryan Tan (4): > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Clarify QP and CQ is_kernel logic > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Use more specific sizeof in kcalloc > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Remove usage of BIT() from UAPI header All of these are applied to for-next, thanks Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html