From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core 01/17] Update rdma/ib_user_verbs.h Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:42:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20180122154206.GC14372@ziepe.ca> References: <20180111221340.965-1-jgg@ziepe.ca> <20180111221340.965-2-jgg@ziepe.ca> <20180115171033.GA2206@ziepe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Yishai Hadas Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Yishai Hadas , Matan Barak List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:48:48PM +0200, Yishai Hadas wrote: > >We could also switch to a more iproute like model where we just > >unconditionally use our copies of the kernel headers.. > > Are you referring to drop the cmake linux header check and always use a > private copy of the latest kernel UAPI file in rdma-core ? it can make more > sense comparing to current candidate code. Yes > It can reside in a folder named 'rdma' and not installed by rdma-core as > applications don't use this file. If so we can drop the fixup file and its > matching check. > > What do you think ? It seems worth doing now, but not as part of this series Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html