From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Request for Comments on SoftiWarp Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 13:39:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20180204203951.GA9242@ziepe.ca> References: <20180202185640.GC9080@ziepe.ca> <031f01d38fad$422520c0$c66f6240$@opengridcomputing.com> <20180114223603.19961-1-bmt@zurich.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bernard Metzler Cc: Steve Wise , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 08:08:31PM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > >Can you use the standard OFA license please? IBM is an OFA member and > >is behloden to the membership agreement requring the common dual > >license. > > > > sorry to see that. What's exactly wrong with the current (dual) license > statement from IBM? I checked several other user libs. All come with > some flavor of a dual BSD/GPLv2 license statement as this one, > as far as I can see. The common BSD license does not have the advertising clause. It is not 'some flavour', the open fabrics agreement specifies their specific flavor of BSD license see COPYING.BSD_MIT Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html