From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] IB/nes: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:29:33 -0600 Message-ID: <20180320162933.GO19744@ziepe.ca> References: <1521514068-8856-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1521514068-8856-6-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20180320145413.GH19744@ziepe.ca> <3b96019a-2b3b-374a-453e-0553fb04c0a7@codeaurora.org> <20180320160151.GM19744@ziepe.ca> <77565861-7697-699f-c876-adf36db9ab5f@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <77565861-7697-699f-c876-adf36db9ab5f@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sinan Kaya Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, sulrich@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Faisal Latif , Doug Ledford , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > In this case, I strongly suspect nes really intended to say wmb() > > Should I change barrier() to wmb() or leave it alone? I have no idea if > nes is actively being maintained or if it is EOL. It is dead, and the HW doesn't work on 64 bit machines. Just ignore it is my advice. Jason