From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB: make INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS configurable Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 01:56:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20180416085620.GA30363@infradead.org> References: <20180413070644.11974-1-gthelen@google.com> <20180415120636.GA10759@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Thelen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Tarick Bedeir List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:02:12AM +0000, Greg Thelen wrote: > I think I've identified the set of options which use > INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS without a kconfig depends: > * CIFS_SMB_DIRECT > * INFINIBAND_SRPT > * NVME_RDMA > * NVME_TARGET_RDMA > > I have patches for the above, but need to finish the commit logs. Let me > know if they'll be nacked and I'll just patch my kernel and forget > upstreaming. I think those are what is needed. But better do a full cycle through the build bot first.. Btw, should we rename the config symbol to something containing RDMACM? The current name seems rather confusing?