From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:30:46 +0300 Message-ID: <20180716103046.GJ3152@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> References: <20180716083012.15410-1-leon@kernel.org> <0cf29652-9034-6283-ef36-95de4588980f@grimberg.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0cf29652-9034-6283-ef36-95de4588980f@grimberg.me> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , RDMA mailing list , Saeed Mahameed , Steve Wise , linux-netdev List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 01:23:24PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Leon, I'd like to see a tested-by tag for this (at least > until I get some time to test it). Of course. Thanks > > The patch itself looks fine to me. --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJbTHPWAAoJEORje4g2clinBk4QALmgKhOSn66nvg5xiOWZrRog rw9rsiVYrUISiReRJelVIadf4COG2Y6ItmpNlHbQGFVxaKVvmwsi8kUZcfOUnKNJ BlasU9ry32lgb4mfpX2r8Pww4BpiRMO3gcqDrlTBJFd890TIy4YFCCkSdWWNoVFf +/Z7Q1mHgN6KxjpacZ7Z/MnCRQsnbbQWN3rruJasJO4Pi5a0Url1DKsJTw6LpSm5 ML/Vp8ORL7QJ90/Cy/3JrRahEVqmMf1We16V5JoorWjxV8vnA6/hAgDdFBJpXIhD cohh3XYOQ4qUcIAZUB8lAVNQnQHn9IbbYm4q7QTMc9eehEXfMQwiH6DGbBVrW/vg Jos4bAJ39jTIpG/LUinqaweO57hI7cKQclvok4IzeMQF0v9X+dUzbxED18Hp3d6N YVUITvlEreFhfFNDj6eXzaUa3LwtLT0Mcmt1RQg8nE6hIZnnlX6zU/n+bqfabTQH gDDdXfAwSH9DTDiWHDjHVQer7NQ3nS551xkudArZH8u3EUVcjE/jA8AoYQ+tOneM EipjqfDTpT7RAxu24+HUn3GUmW/dc3AyYyEHID/CMACygW97/tPwYPVJJNtB9jbC 6H82aaCqNnFhZi+2HSKMxQDWJ0EBu3UXhaP4vla8cowXIeX53j/9eSi73LhHboja 1BYSpYK/PMl6MU3ypVz2 =iNuk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf--