From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:49:10 -0600
Message-ID: <20180723164910.GS31540@mellanox.com>
References: <40d49fe1-c548-31ec-7daa-b19056215d69@mellanox.com>
 <243215dc-2b06-9c99-a0cb-8a45e0257077@opengridcomputing.com>
 <3f827784-3089-2375-9feb-b3c1701d7471@mellanox.com>
 <01cd01d41dce$992f4f30$cb8ded90$@opengridcomputing.com>
 <0834cae6-33d6-3526-7d85-f5cae18c5487@grimberg.me>
 <9a4d8d50-19b0-fcaa-d4a3-6cfa2318a973@mellanox.com>
 <02dc01d41ecd$9cc8a0b0$d659e210$@opengridcomputing.com>
 <c5362a12-4be6-9f17-7f06-a52aed69e3b6@mellanox.com>
 <a9c4a70d-d578-0581-09aa-a3a56f3b2c02@opengridcomputing.com>
 <f936d176-c56b-143e-3311-f6df48f633dd@mellanox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f936d176-c56b-143e-3311-f6df48f633dd@mellanox.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>, 'Sagi Grimberg' <sagi@grimberg.me>, 'Leon Romanovsky' <leon@kernel.org>, 'Doug Ledford' <dledford@redhat.com>, 'RDMA mailing list' <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, 'Saeed Mahameed' <saeedm@mellanox.com>, 'linux-netdev' <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 04:25:32AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> >>>[ 2032.194376] nvme nvme0: failed to connect queue: 9 ret=-18
> >>
> >>queue 9 is not mapped (overlap).
> >>please try the bellow:
> >>
> >
> >This seems to work.  Here are three mapping cases:  each vector on its
> >own cpu, each vector on 1 cpu within the local numa node, and each
> >vector having all cpus in its numa node.  The 2nd mapping looks kinda
> >funny, but I think it achieved what you wanted?  And all the cases
> >resulted in successful connections.
> >
> 
> Thanks for testing this.
> I slightly improved the setting of the left CPUs and actually used Sagi's
> initial proposal.
> 
> Sagi,
> please review the attached patch and let me know if I should add your
> signature on it.
> I'll run some perf test early next week on it (meanwhile I run login/logout
> with different num_queues successfully and irq settings).
> 
> Steve,
> It will be great if you can apply the attached in your system and send your
> findings.
> 
> Regards,
> Max,

So the conlusion to this thread is that Leon's mlx5 patch needs to wait
until this block-mq patch is accepted?

Thanks,
Jason