From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ucma: fix a use-after-free in ucma_resolve_ip()
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:27:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180912232744.12693-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
There is a race condition between ucma_close() and ucma_resolve_ip():
CPU0 CPU1
ucma_resolve_ip(): ucma_close():
ctx = ucma_get_ctx(file, cmd.id);
list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx, tmp, &file->ctx_list, list) {
mutex_lock(&mut);
idr_remove(&ctx_idr, ctx->id);
mutex_unlock(&mut);
...
mutex_lock(&mut);
if (!ctx->closing) {
mutex_unlock(&mut);
rdma_destroy_id(ctx->cm_id);
...
ucma_free_ctx(ctx);
ret = rdma_resolve_addr();
ucma_put_ctx(ctx);
Before idr_remove(), ucma_get_ctx() could still find the ctx
and after rdma_destroy_id(), rdma_resolve_addr() may still
access id_priv pointer. Also, ucma_put_ctx() may use ctx after
ucma_free_ctx() too.
ucma_close() should call ucma_put_ctx() too which tests the
refcnt and waits for the last one releasing it. The similar
pattern is already used by ucma_destroy_id().
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+da2591e115d57a9cbb8b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+cfe3c1e8ef634ba8964b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
index 5f437d1570fb..21863ddde63e 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
@@ -1759,6 +1759,8 @@ static int ucma_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
mutex_lock(&mut);
if (!ctx->closing) {
mutex_unlock(&mut);
+ ucma_put_ctx(ctx);
+ wait_for_completion(&ctx->comp);
/* rdma_destroy_id ensures that no event handlers are
* inflight for that id before releasing it.
*/
--
2.14.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 23:27 Cong Wang [this message]
2018-09-13 5:49 ` [PATCH] ucma: fix a use-after-free in ucma_resolve_ip() Leon Romanovsky
2018-09-13 17:05 ` Doug Ledford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180912232744.12693-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox