Re: [PATCH v9 13/13] nvmet: Optionally use PCI P2P memory

[Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:29:19PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018-10-04 4:20 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >> +static inline struct device *nvmet_ns_dev(struct nvmet_ns *ns)
> >> +{
> >> +	return disk_to_dev(ns->bdev->bd_disk);
> >> +}
> > 
> > This needs to handle non bdev namespaces.
> 
> As it's coded now the helper never gets called unless ns->bdev is not
> null. But in general, yes you are right, we should probably return NULL
> if ns->bdev is NULL.

I'd rather skip that for now.

> > index ef286b72d958..3d12f5f4568d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
> > @@ -2280,6 +2280,7 @@ nvmet_fc_handle_fcp_rqst(struct nvmet_fc_tgtport 
> > *tgtport,
> >          fod->req.cmd = &fod->cmdiubuf.sqe;
> >          fod->req.rsp = &fod->rspiubuf.cqe;
> >          fod->req.port = tgtport->pe->port;
> > +       fod->req.p2p_client = tgtport->dev;
> > 
> >          /* clear any response payload */
> >          memset(&fod->rspiubuf, 0, sizeof(fod->rspiubuf));
> > --
> 
> Sure, I guess that makes sense. I've never tried it with fc hardware but
> I assume there's no reason it wouldn't work.
> 
> I'll queue these changes up for a v10.

And I'd wait until someone has actually tested this case.