* [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 032/170] net/mlx5: EQ, Use the right place to store/read IRQ affinity hint
[not found] <20190128161200.55107-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2019-01-28 16:09 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-28 16:10 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 072/170] IB/hfi1: Unreserve a reserved request when it is completed Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-01-28 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Saeed Mahameed, Leon Romanovsky, Sasha Levin, netdev, linux-rdma
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
[ Upstream commit 1e86ace4c140fd5a693e266c9b23409358f25381 ]
Currently the cpu affinity hint mask for completion EQs is stored and
read from the wrong place, since reading and storing is done from the
same index, there is no actual issue with that, but internal irq_info
for completion EQs stars at MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE offset in irq_info
array, this patch changes the code to use the correct offset to store
and read the IRQ affinity hint.
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 14 ++++++++------
include/linux/mlx5/driver.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index bf34264c734b..14bab8a5550d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ static void mlx5e_close_cq(struct mlx5e_cq *cq)
static int mlx5e_get_cpu(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, int ix)
{
- return cpumask_first(priv->mdev->priv.irq_info[ix].mask);
+ return cpumask_first(priv->mdev->priv.irq_info[ix + MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE].mask);
}
static int mlx5e_open_tx_cqs(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
index e99f1382a4f0..558fc6a05e2a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
@@ -619,18 +619,19 @@ u64 mlx5_read_internal_timer(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
static int mlx5_irq_set_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, int i)
{
struct mlx5_priv *priv = &mdev->priv;
- int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i);
+ int vecidx = MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i;
+ int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, vecidx);
- if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->irq_info[i].mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
mlx5_core_warn(mdev, "zalloc_cpumask_var failed");
return -ENOMEM;
}
cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_local_spread(i, priv->numa_node),
- priv->irq_info[i].mask);
+ priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) &&
- irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, priv->irq_info[i].mask))
+ irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask))
mlx5_core_warn(mdev, "irq_set_affinity_hint failed, irq 0x%.4x", irq);
return 0;
@@ -638,11 +639,12 @@ static int mlx5_irq_set_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, int i)
static void mlx5_irq_clear_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, int i)
{
+ int vecidx = MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i;
struct mlx5_priv *priv = &mdev->priv;
- int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + i);
+ int irq = pci_irq_vector(mdev->pdev, vecidx);
irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, NULL);
- free_cpumask_var(priv->irq_info[i].mask);
+ free_cpumask_var(priv->irq_info[vecidx].mask);
}
static int mlx5_irq_set_affinity_hints(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
index fb677e4f902d..88f0c530fe9c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ enum {
static inline const struct cpumask *
mlx5_get_vector_affinity_hint(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int vector)
{
- return dev->priv.irq_info[vector].mask;
+ return dev->priv.irq_info[vector + MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE].mask;
}
#endif /* MLX5_DRIVER_H */
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 072/170] IB/hfi1: Unreserve a reserved request when it is completed
[not found] <20190128161200.55107-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-01-28 16:09 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 032/170] net/mlx5: EQ, Use the right place to store/read IRQ affinity hint Sasha Levin
@ 2019-01-28 16:10 ` Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-01-28 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: Kaike Wan, Dennis Dalessandro, Jason Gunthorpe, Sasha Levin,
linux-rdma
From: Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@intel.com>
[ Upstream commit ca95f802ef5139722acc8d30aeaab6fe5bbe939e ]
Currently, When a reserved operation is completed, its entry in the send
queue will not be unreserved, which leads to the miscalculation of
qp->s_avail and thus the triggering of a WARN_ON call trace. This patch
fixes the problem by unreserving the reserved operation when it is
completed.
Fixes: 856cc4c237ad ("IB/hfi1: Add the capability for reserved operations")
Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c
index 818bac1a4056..d3b8cb92fd6d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c
@@ -1162,6 +1162,7 @@ void hfi1_rc_send_complete(struct rvt_qp *qp, struct hfi1_opa_header *opah)
if (cmp_psn(wqe->lpsn, qp->s_sending_psn) >= 0 &&
cmp_psn(qp->s_sending_psn, qp->s_sending_hpsn) <= 0)
break;
+ rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve(qp, wqe);
s_last = qp->s_last;
trace_hfi1_qp_send_completion(qp, wqe, s_last);
if (++s_last >= qp->s_size)
@@ -1214,6 +1215,7 @@ static struct rvt_swqe *do_rc_completion(struct rvt_qp *qp,
u32 s_last;
rvt_put_swqe(wqe);
+ rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve(qp, wqe);
s_last = qp->s_last;
trace_hfi1_qp_send_completion(qp, wqe, s_last);
if (++s_last >= qp->s_size)
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-28 16:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190128161200.55107-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-01-28 16:09 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 032/170] net/mlx5: EQ, Use the right place to store/read IRQ affinity hint Sasha Levin
2019-01-28 16:10 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 072/170] IB/hfi1: Unreserve a reserved request when it is completed Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).