From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers/IB,qib: do not use mmap_sem Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:19:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20190129231903.GA5352@ziepe.ca> References: <20190121174220.10583-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20190121174220.10583-4-dave@stgolabs.net> <20190128233140.GA12530@ziepe.ca> <20190129044607.GL25106@ziepe.ca> <20190129185005.GC10129@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190129185005.GC10129@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ira Weiny Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , akpm@linux-foundation.org, dledford@redhat.com, jack@suse.de, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dennis.dalessandro@intel.com, mike.marciniszyn@intel.com, Davidlohr Bueso List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:50:05AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > > .. and I'm looking at some of the other conversions here.. *most > > likely* any caller that is manipulating rlimit for get_user_pages > > should really be calling get_user_pages_longterm, so they should not > > be converted to use _fast? > > Is this a question? I'm not sure I understand the meaning here? More an invitation to disprove the statement Jason