From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 00/13] Get rid of switchdev_ops Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:52:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20190202155231.GD2778@nanopsycho> References: <20190201220657.30170-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190201220657.30170-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Fainelli Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michael Chan , "David S. Miller" , Derek Chickles , Satanand Burla , Felix Manlunas , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Alexandre Belloni , Microchip Linux Driver Support , Jakub Kicinski , Ioana Radulescu , Ioana Ciornei , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ivan Vecera , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:06:44PM CET, f.fainelli@gmail.com wrote: >Hi all, > >This patch series converts SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_{GET,SET} to use a >blocking notifier, similar to how SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_{ADD,DEL} has been >changed recently by Petr. > >This was suggested by Ido to help with a particular use case I have >where I want to be able to veto a switchdev bridge attribute from a >driver (multicast_snooping). > >Please review since I may not have gotten the driver abstraction right, >especially for mlx5e and nfp since these are *hum* *hum* large drivers. Looks fine. Thanks!