From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] svcrdma: Ignore source port when computing DRC hash Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:08:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20190606130804.19EE32070B@mail.kernel.org> References: <20190605121518.2150.26479.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190605121518.2150.26479.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sasha Levin , Chuck Lever , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.orgstable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.7, v5.0.21, v4.19.48, v4.14.123, v4.9.180, v4.4.180. v5.1.7: Build OK! v5.0.21: Build OK! v4.19.48: Build OK! v4.14.123: Build OK! v4.9.180: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.4.180: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:635:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] How should we proceed with this patch?