From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 14/15] {IB, net}/mlx5: E-Switch, Use index of
 rep for vport to IB port mapping
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:42:23 +0000
Message-ID: <20190618104220.GH4690@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
References: <20190617192247.25107-1-saeedm@mellanox.com>
 <20190617192247.25107-15-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190617192247.25107-15-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-ID: <438C83407DC05A4DA2CCFF67389D0F6F@eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>, Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>
List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 07:23:37PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com>
>
> In the single IB device mode, the mapping between vport number and
> rep relies on a counter. However for dynamic vport allocation, it is
> desired to keep consistent map of eswitch vport and IB port.
>
> Hence, simplify code to remove the free running counter and instead
> use the available vport index during load/unload sequence from the
> eswitch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com>
> Suggested-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>

We are not adding multiple "*-by" for same user, please choose one.

Thanks