From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 1/2] RDMA/core: Introduce ratelimited ibdev printk functions
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:41:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731074109.GL4878@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd2c23a3-1d92-56d4-933e-68ec37aebb65@amazon.com>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:22:42AM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 30/07/2019 18:41, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:18:33PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> >> Add ratelimited helpers to the ibdev_* printk functions.
> >> Implementation inspired by counterpart dev_*_ratelimited functions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>
> >> ---
> >> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> >> index c5f8a9f17063..356e6a105366 100644
> >> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> >> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> >> @@ -107,6 +107,57 @@ static inline
> >> void ibdev_dbg(const struct ib_device *ibdev, const char *format, ...) {}
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> +#define ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_level, ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> +do { \
> >> + static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs, \
> >> + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, \
> >> + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST); \
> >> + if (__ratelimit(&_rs)) \
> >> + ibdev_level(ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> >> +} while (0)
> >> +
> >> +#define ibdev_emerg_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> + ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_emerg, ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >> +#define ibdev_alert_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> + ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_alert, ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >> +#define ibdev_crit_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> + ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_crit, ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >> +#define ibdev_err_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> + ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_err, ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >> +#define ibdev_warn_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> + ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_warn, ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >> +#define ibdev_notice_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> + ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_notice, ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >> +#define ibdev_info_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> + ibdev_level_ratelimited(ibdev_info, ibdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >> +
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> >> +/* descriptor check is first to prevent flooding with "callbacks suppressed" */
> >> +#define ibdev_dbg_ratelimited(ibdev, fmt, ...) \
> >> +do { \
> >> + static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs, \
> >> + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, \
> >> + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST); \
> >> + DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
> >> + if (DYNAMIC_DEBUG_BRANCH(descriptor) && __ratelimit(&_rs)) \
> >> + __dynamic_ibdev_dbg(&descriptor, ibdev, fmt, \
> >> + ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> >> +} while (0)
> >> +#elif defined(DEBUG)
> >
> > When will you see this CONFIG_DEBUG set? I suspect only in private
> > out-of-tree builds which we are not really care. Also I can't imagine
> > system with this CONFIG_DEBUG and without CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG.
>
> This is the common way to handle debug prints, see:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2.1/source/include/linux/printk.h#L331
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2.1/source/include/linux/device.h#L1493
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2.1/source/include/linux/netdevice.h#L4743
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2.1/source/include/linux/net.h#L266
I'm more interested to know the real usage of this copy/paste and
understand if it makes sense for drivers/infiniband/* or not.
Not everything in netdev is great and worth to borrow.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-31 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-30 15:18 [PATCH for-next 0/2] Ratelimited ibdev printk functions Gal Pressman
2019-07-30 15:18 ` [PATCH for-next 1/2] RDMA/core: Introduce ratelimited " Gal Pressman
2019-07-30 15:41 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 7:22 ` Gal Pressman
2019-07-31 7:41 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2019-07-31 10:51 ` Gal Pressman
2019-07-31 11:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 12:56 ` Gal Pressman
2019-07-31 13:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 14:19 ` Gal Pressman
2019-07-31 14:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 15:26 ` Gal Pressman
2019-07-31 17:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-30 15:18 ` [PATCH for-next 2/2] RDMA/efa: Rate limit admin queue error prints Gal Pressman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190731074109.GL4878@mtr-leonro.mtl.com \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=galpress@amazon.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).