Re: [PATCH rdma-core 2/2] cxgb4: remove unused c4iw_match_device

[Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>]

On Tuesday, August 08/06/19, 2019 at 15:18:49 +0530, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:09:02AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 04:36:53PM +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote:
> > > On Monday, July 07/29/19, 2019 at 13:16:20 +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, July 07/28/19, 2019 at 14:07:49 +0530, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 03:14:24PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:19:28PM +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote:
> > > > > > > match_device handler is no longer needed after latest device binding changes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  providers/cxgb4/dev.c | 41 -----------------------------------------
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 41 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you know if we can also drop the same code in cxgb3?
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we simply remove cxgb3?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am in talks with the people here. I'll confirm it soon.
> > >
> > > Hi Jason/Doug/Leon,
> > > Chelsio is fine with removing cxgb3.
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> 
> Which parts of cxgb3 can we remove? RDMA, scsi, net or everything?

I can only say RDMA. For net and scsi parts of cxgb3, the corresponding 
maintainers might request for their removal.
Should I send a patch removing RDMA cxgb3?

Thanks.