From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] RDMA/ucma: Reduce the number of rdma_destroy_id() calls
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:07:30 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191001150730.GD22532@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190930231707.48259-2-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:16:53PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Instead of calling rdma_destroy_id() after waiting for the context completion
> finished, call rdma_destroy_id() from inside the ucma_put_ctx() function.
> This patch reduces the number of rdma_destroy_id() calls but does not change
> the behavior of this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
> index 0274e9b704be..30c09864fd9e 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
> @@ -160,8 +160,14 @@ static struct ucma_context *ucma_get_ctx(struct ucma_file *file, int id)
>
> static void ucma_put_ctx(struct ucma_context *ctx)
> {
> - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->ref))
> - complete(&ctx->comp);
> + if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->ref))
> + return;
> + /*
> + * rdma_destroy_id() ensures that no event handlers are inflight
> + * for that id before releasing it.
> + */
> + rdma_destroy_id(ctx->cm_id);
> + complete(&ctx->comp);
> }
Since all the refcounting here is basically insane, you can't do this
without creating new kinds of bugs related to lifetime of ctx->cm_id
The call to rdma_destroy_id must be after the xa_erase as other
threads can continue to access the context despite its zero ref via
ucma_get_ctx(() as ucma_get_ctx() is not using refcounts properly.
The xa_erase provides the needed barrier.
Maybe this patch could be fixed if the ucma_get_ctx used an
atomic_inc_not_zero ?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-01 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-30 23:16 [PATCH 00/15] RDMA patches for kernel v5.5 Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 01/15] RDMA/ucma: Reduce the number of rdma_destroy_id() calls Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 15:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-01 17:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 02/15] RDMA/iwcm: Fix a lock inversion issue Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 15:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 03/15] RDMA/siw: Simplify several debug messages Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 11:39 ` Bernard Metzler
2019-10-01 15:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 04/15] RDMA/siw: Fix port number endianness in a debug message Bart Van Assche
2019-10-01 11:45 ` Bernard Metzler
2019-10-01 15:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 05/15] RDMA/siw: Make node GUIDs valid EUI-64 identifiers Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 06/15] RDMA/srp: Remove two casts Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:16 ` [PATCH 07/15] RDMA/srp: Honor the max_send_sge device attribute Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 08/15] RDMA/srp: Make route resolving error messages more informative Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 09/15] RDMA/srpt: Fix handling of SR-IOV and iWARP ports Bart Van Assche
2019-10-02 14:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-02 15:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-02 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-02 17:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-02 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-03 8:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 10/15] RDMA/srpt: Fix handling of iWARP logins Bart Van Assche
2019-10-02 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-02 15:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/srpt: Improve a debug message Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 12/15] RDMA/srpt: Rework the approach for closing an RDMA channel Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 13/15] RDMA/srpt: Rework the code that waits until an RDMA port is no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 14/15] RDMA/srpt: Make the code for handling port identities more systematic Bart Van Assche
2019-09-30 23:17 ` [PATCH 15/15] RDMA/srpt: Postpone HCA removal until after configfs directory removal Bart Van Assche
2019-10-04 18:36 ` [PATCH 00/15] RDMA patches for kernel v5.5 Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191001150730.GD22532@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).