From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Yixian Liu <liuyixian@huawei.com>
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 for-next 1/2] RDMA/hns: Add the workqueue framework for flush cqe handler
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 10:19:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191226081923.GB6285@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577193014-42646-2-git-send-email-liuyixian@huawei.com>
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 09:10:13PM +0800, Yixian Liu wrote:
> HiP08 RoCE hardware lacks ability(a known hardware problem) to flush
> outstanding WQEs if QP state gets into errored mode for some reason.
> To overcome this hardware problem and as a workaround, when QP is
> detected to be in errored state during various legs like post send,
> post receive etc [1], flush needs to be performed from the driver.
>
> The earlier patch[1] sent to solve the hardware limitation explained
> in the cover-letter had a bug in the software flushing leg. It
> acquired mutex while modifying QP state to errored state and while
> conveying it to the hardware using the mailbox. This caused leg to
> sleep while holding spin-lock and caused crash.
>
> Suggested Solution:
> we have proposed to defer the flushing of the QP in the Errored state
> using the workqueue to get around with the limitation of our hardware.
>
> This patch adds the framework of the workqueue and the flush handler
> function.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10534271/
>
> Signed-off-by: Yixian Liu <liuyixian@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 2 ++
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 4 +--
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> index a1b712e..292b712 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> @@ -906,6 +906,7 @@ struct hns_roce_caps {
> struct hns_roce_work {
> struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev;
> struct work_struct work;
> + struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp;
> u32 qpn;
> u32 cqn;
> int event_type;
> @@ -1226,6 +1227,7 @@ struct ib_qp *hns_roce_create_qp(struct ib_pd *ib_pd,
> struct ib_udata *udata);
> int hns_roce_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp, struct ib_qp_attr *attr,
> int attr_mask, struct ib_udata *udata);
> +void init_flush_work(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp);
> void *get_recv_wqe(struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp, int n);
> void *get_send_wqe(struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp, int n);
> void *get_send_extend_sge(struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp, int n);
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> index 907c951..ec48e7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> @@ -5967,8 +5967,8 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_init_eq_table(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
> goto err_request_irq_fail;
> }
>
> - hr_dev->irq_workq =
> - create_singlethread_workqueue("hns_roce_irq_workqueue");
> + hr_dev->irq_workq = alloc_workqueue("hns_roce_irq_workqueue",
> + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
Combination of WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag with kzalloc inside init_flush_work()
can't be correct at the same time.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-26 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-24 13:10 [PATCH v4 for-next 0/2] Fix crash due to sleepy mutex while holding lock in post_{send|recv|poll} Yixian Liu
2019-12-24 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 1/2] RDMA/hns: Add the workqueue framework for flush cqe handler Yixian Liu
2019-12-26 8:19 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2019-12-27 9:59 ` Liuyixian (Eason)
2019-12-24 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 2/2] RDMA/hns: Delayed flush cqe process with workqueue Yixian Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191226081923.GB6285@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyixian@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox