linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@broadcom.com>
Cc: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/7] Refactor control path of bnxt_re driver
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 18:04:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200125180355.GE4616@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1579845165-18002-1-git-send-email-devesh.sharma@broadcom.com>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:52:38AM -0500, Devesh Sharma wrote:
> This is the first series out of few more forthcoming series to refactor
> Broadcom's RoCE driver. This series contains patches to refactor control
> path. Since this is first series, there may be few code section which may
> look redundant or overkill but those will be taken care in future patche
> series.
> 
> These patches apply clean on tip of for-next branch.
> Each patch in this series is tested against user and kernel functionality.
> 
> Devesh Sharma (7):
>   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor queue pair creation code
>   RDMA/bnxt_re: Replace chip context structure with pointer
>   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor hardware queue memory allocation
>   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor net ring allocation function
>   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor command queue management code
>   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor notification queue management code
>   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor doorbell management functions
> 
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/bnxt_re.h    |  24 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c   | 670 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/main.c       | 134 +++---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.c   | 423 +++++++++---------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.h   |  94 ++--
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c | 474 ++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.h |  85 ++--
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_res.c  | 475 ++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_res.h  | 145 ++++++-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_sp.c   |  52 ++-
>  10 files changed, 1579 insertions(+), 997 deletions(-)

Usually when you 'refactor' something the code gets smaller, not
larger. What is going on here?

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-25 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-24  5:52 [PATCH for-next 0/7] Refactor control path of bnxt_re driver Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 1/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor queue pair creation code Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24 11:23   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-25 17:03     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 18:50       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27  7:39         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-30  6:04           ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 17:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-27  8:13     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27  8:16       ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27  9:27         ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27  9:26       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 11:31         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-30  6:04       ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-30 13:37   ` Parav Pandit
2020-01-30 16:03     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 2/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Replace chip context structure with pointer Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 18:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-27  7:39     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27  8:04       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 11:17         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-28 20:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-30  6:05         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 3/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor hardware queue memory allocation Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 4/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor net ring allocation function Devesh Sharma
2020-01-26 14:29   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27  7:40     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27  8:02       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 11:25         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27 12:44           ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 14:14             ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-28 18:09               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-28  0:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-28  2:43         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-28 18:09           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-29  8:29             ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 5/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor command queue management code Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 6/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor notification " Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 7/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor doorbell management functions Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 18:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-01-27  7:39   ` [PATCH for-next 0/7] Refactor control path of bnxt_re driver Devesh Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200125180355.GE4616@mellanox.com \
    --to=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=devesh.sharma@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).