From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 3/5] RDMA/hns: Optimize the wr opcode conversion from ib to hns
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:18:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305061839.GQ121803@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1583151093-30402-4-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:11:31PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
> From: Xi Wang <wangxi11@huawei.com>
>
> Simplify the wr opcode conversion from ib to hns by using a map table
> instead of the switch-case statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <wangxi11@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> index c8c345f..ea61ccb 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,47 @@ static void set_data_seg_v2(struct hns_roce_v2_wqe_data_seg *dseg,
> dseg->len = cpu_to_le32(sg->length);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * mapped-value = 1 + real-value
> + * The hns wr opcode real value is start from 0, In order to distinguish between
> + * initialized and uninitialized map values, we plus 1 to the actual value when
> + * defining the mapping, so that the validity can be identified by checking the
> + * mapped value is greater than 0.
> + */
> +#define HR_OPC_MAP(ib_key, hr_key) \
> + [IB_WR_ ## ib_key] = 1 + HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_ ## hr_key
> +
> +static const u32 hns_roce_op_code[] = {
> + HR_OPC_MAP(RDMA_WRITE, RDMA_WRITE),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(RDMA_WRITE_WITH_IMM, RDMA_WRITE_WITH_IMM),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(SEND, SEND),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(SEND_WITH_IMM, SEND_WITH_IMM),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(RDMA_READ, RDMA_READ),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(ATOMIC_CMP_AND_SWP, ATOM_CMP_AND_SWAP),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(ATOMIC_FETCH_AND_ADD, ATOM_FETCH_AND_ADD),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(SEND_WITH_INV, SEND_WITH_INV),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(LOCAL_INV, LOCAL_INV),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(MASKED_ATOMIC_CMP_AND_SWP, ATOM_MSK_CMP_AND_SWAP),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(MASKED_ATOMIC_FETCH_AND_ADD, ATOM_MSK_FETCH_AND_ADD),
> + HR_OPC_MAP(REG_MR, FAST_REG_PMR),
> + [IB_WR_RESERVED1] = 0,
hns_roce_op_code[] is declared as static, everything is initialized to
0, there is no need to set 0 again.
> +};
> +
> +static inline u32 to_hr_opcode(u32 ib_opcode)
No inline functions in *.c, please.
> +{
> + u32 hr_opcode = 0;
> +
> + if (ib_opcode < IB_WR_RESERVED1)
if (ib_opcode > ARRAY_SIZE(hns_roce_op_code) - 1)
return HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_MASK;
return hns_roce_op_code[ib_opcode];
> + hr_opcode = hns_roce_op_code[ib_opcode];
> +
> + /* exist a valid mapping definition for ib code */
> + if (hr_opcode > 0)
> + return hr_opcode - 1;
> +
> + /* default hns roce wr opcode */
> + return HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_MASK;
> +}
> +
> static void set_frmr_seg(struct hns_roce_v2_rc_send_wqe *rc_sq_wqe,
> void *wqe, const struct ib_reg_wr *wr)
> {
> @@ -303,7 +344,6 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_post_send(struct ib_qp *ibqp,
> void *wqe = NULL;
> bool loopback;
> u32 tmp_len;
> - u32 hr_op;
> u8 *smac;
> int nreq;
> int ret;
> @@ -517,76 +557,52 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_post_send(struct ib_qp *ibqp,
> wqe += sizeof(struct hns_roce_v2_rc_send_wqe);
> switch (wr->opcode) {
> case IB_WR_RDMA_READ:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_RDMA_READ;
> rc_sq_wqe->rkey =
> cpu_to_le32(rdma_wr(wr)->rkey);
> rc_sq_wqe->va =
> cpu_to_le64(rdma_wr(wr)->remote_addr);
> break;
> case IB_WR_RDMA_WRITE:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_RDMA_WRITE;
> rc_sq_wqe->rkey =
> cpu_to_le32(rdma_wr(wr)->rkey);
> rc_sq_wqe->va =
> cpu_to_le64(rdma_wr(wr)->remote_addr);
> break;
> case IB_WR_RDMA_WRITE_WITH_IMM:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_RDMA_WRITE_WITH_IMM;
> rc_sq_wqe->rkey =
> cpu_to_le32(rdma_wr(wr)->rkey);
> rc_sq_wqe->va =
> cpu_to_le64(rdma_wr(wr)->remote_addr);
> break;
> - case IB_WR_SEND:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_SEND;
> - break;
> - case IB_WR_SEND_WITH_INV:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_SEND_WITH_INV;
> - break;
> - case IB_WR_SEND_WITH_IMM:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_SEND_WITH_IMM;
> - break;
> case IB_WR_LOCAL_INV:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_LOCAL_INV;
> roce_set_bit(rc_sq_wqe->byte_4,
> V2_RC_SEND_WQE_BYTE_4_SO_S, 1);
> rc_sq_wqe->inv_key =
> cpu_to_le32(wr->ex.invalidate_rkey);
> break;
> case IB_WR_REG_MR:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_FAST_REG_PMR;
> set_frmr_seg(rc_sq_wqe, wqe, reg_wr(wr));
> break;
> case IB_WR_ATOMIC_CMP_AND_SWP:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_ATOM_CMP_AND_SWAP;
> rc_sq_wqe->rkey =
> cpu_to_le32(atomic_wr(wr)->rkey);
> rc_sq_wqe->va =
> cpu_to_le64(atomic_wr(wr)->remote_addr);
> break;
> case IB_WR_ATOMIC_FETCH_AND_ADD:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_ATOM_FETCH_AND_ADD;
> rc_sq_wqe->rkey =
> cpu_to_le32(atomic_wr(wr)->rkey);
> rc_sq_wqe->va =
> cpu_to_le64(atomic_wr(wr)->remote_addr);
> break;
> - case IB_WR_MASKED_ATOMIC_CMP_AND_SWP:
> - hr_op =
> - HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_ATOM_MSK_CMP_AND_SWAP;
> - break;
> - case IB_WR_MASKED_ATOMIC_FETCH_AND_ADD:
> - hr_op =
> - HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_ATOM_MSK_FETCH_AND_ADD;
> - break;
> default:
> - hr_op = HNS_ROCE_V2_WQE_OP_MASK;
> break;
> }
>
> roce_set_field(rc_sq_wqe->byte_4,
> V2_RC_SEND_WQE_BYTE_4_OPCODE_M,
> - V2_RC_SEND_WQE_BYTE_4_OPCODE_S, hr_op);
> + V2_RC_SEND_WQE_BYTE_4_OPCODE_S,
> + to_hr_opcode(wr->opcode));
>
> if (wr->opcode == IB_WR_ATOMIC_CMP_AND_SWP ||
> wr->opcode == IB_WR_ATOMIC_FETCH_AND_ADD)
> --
> 2.8.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-02 12:11 [PATCH for-next 0/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor wqe related codes Weihang Li
2020-03-02 12:11 ` [PATCH for-next 1/5] RDMA/hns: Rename wqe buffer related functions Weihang Li
2020-03-05 6:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-02 12:11 ` [PATCH for-next 2/5] RDMA/hns: Optimize wqe buffer filling process for post send Weihang Li
2020-03-05 6:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-02 12:11 ` [PATCH for-next 3/5] RDMA/hns: Optimize the wr opcode conversion from ib to hns Weihang Li
2020-03-05 6:18 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-03-05 11:22 ` liweihang
2020-03-05 12:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 13:12 ` liweihang
2020-03-05 13:28 ` liweihang
2020-03-05 14:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-05 14:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-02 12:11 ` [PATCH for-next 4/5] RDMA/hns: Optimize base address table config flow for qp buffer Weihang Li
2020-03-04 19:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-05 6:08 ` liweihang
2020-03-02 12:11 ` [PATCH for-next 5/5] RDMA/hns: Optimize wqe buffer set flow for post send Weihang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200305061839.GQ121803@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox