linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: George Spelvin <lkml@sdf.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@intel.com>,
	Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 42/50] drivers/ininiband: Use get_random_u32()
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:36:21 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200329143621.GF20941@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202003281643.02SGhN9T020186@sdf.org>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 08:21:45PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> There's no need to get_random_bytes() into a temporary buffer.
> 
> This is not a no-brainer change; get_random_u32() has slightly weaker
> security guarantees, but code like this is the classic example of when
> it's appropriate: the random value is stored in the kernel for as long
> as it's valuable.

The mechanical transformation looks OK, but can someone who knows the
RNG confirm this statement?

Many of these places are being used in network related contexts, I
suspect the value here is often less about secrecy, more about
unguessability.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-29 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-22  0:21 [RFC PATCH v1 42/50] drivers/ininiband: Use get_random_u32() George Spelvin
2020-03-29 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-03-29 16:31   ` George Spelvin
2020-03-29 15:01 ` Bernard Metzler
2020-03-29 16:52   ` George Spelvin
2020-03-29 20:02     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-29 20:45       ` George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200329143621.GF20941@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=bmt@zurich.ibm.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=faisal.latif@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@sdf.org \
    --cc=shiraz.saleem@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).