From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22648C54FD0 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EF12076B for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728676AbgDUMAB (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:00:01 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:46268 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726691AbgDUMAB (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:00:01 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1E6D268C7B; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:59:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:59:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Max Gurtovoy Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, martin.petersen@oracle.com, jsmart2021@gmail.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, idanb@mellanox.com, axboe@kernel.dk, vladimirk@mellanox.com, oren@mellanox.com, shlomin@mellanox.com, israelr@mellanox.com, jgg@mellanox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] nvme: Add has_md field to the nvme_req structure Message-ID: <20200421115958.GC26432@lst.de> References: <20200327171545.98970-1-maxg@mellanox.com> <20200327171545.98970-4-maxg@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200327171545.98970-4-maxg@mellanox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:15:30PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > From: Israel Rukshin > > Transport drivers will use this field to determine if the request has > metadata. Can we make this a flags field with a bit? Also why do we even need it, can't we use blk_integrity_rq?