From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 04/10] RDMA/cm: Pull duplicated code into cm_queue_work_unlock()
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 10:46:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200506074701.9775-5-leon@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506074701.9775-1-leon@kernel.org>
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
While unlocking a spinlock held by the caller is a disturbing pattern,
this extensively duplicated code is even worse. Pull all the duplicates
into a function and explain the purpose of the algorithm.
The on creation side call in cm_req_handler() which is different has been
micro-optimized on the basis that the work_count == -1 during creation,
remove that and just use the normal function.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c | 146 +++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
index 439055c463fa..e7c20c44a361 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
@@ -83,8 +83,11 @@ const char *__attribute_const__ ibcm_reject_msg(int reason)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ibcm_reject_msg);
struct cm_id_private;
+struct cm_work;
static int cm_add_one(struct ib_device *device);
static void cm_remove_one(struct ib_device *device, void *client_data);
+static void cm_process_work(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv,
+ struct cm_work *work);
static int cm_send_sidr_rep_locked(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv,
struct ib_cm_sidr_rep_param *param);
static int cm_send_dreq_locked(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv,
@@ -911,6 +914,35 @@ static void cm_free_work(struct cm_work *work)
kfree(work);
}
+static void cm_queue_work_unlock(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv,
+ struct cm_work *work)
+{
+ bool immediate;
+
+ /*
+ * To deliver the event to the user callback we have the drop the
+ * spinlock, however, we need to ensure that the user callback is single
+ * threaded and receives events in the temporal order. If there are
+ * already events being processed then thread new events onto a list,
+ * the thread currently processing will pick them up.
+ */
+ immediate = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
+ if (!immediate) {
+ list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
+ /*
+ * This routine always consumes incoming reference. Once queued
+ * to the work_list then a reference is held by the thread
+ * currently running cm_process_work() and this reference is not
+ * needed.
+ */
+ cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
+
+ if (immediate)
+ cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
+}
+
static inline int cm_convert_to_ms(int iba_time)
{
/* approximate conversion to ms from 4.096us x 2^iba_time */
@@ -2159,9 +2191,7 @@ static int cm_req_handler(struct cm_work *work)
/* Refcount belongs to the event, pairs with cm_process_work() */
refcount_inc(&cm_id_priv->refcount);
- atomic_inc(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
/*
* Since this ID was just created and was not made visible to other MAD
* handlers until the cm_finalize_id() above we know that the
@@ -2519,15 +2549,7 @@ static int cm_rep_handler(struct cm_work *work)
cm_id_priv->alt_av.timeout - 1);
ib_cancel_mad(cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent, cm_id_priv->msg);
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
error:
@@ -2538,7 +2560,6 @@ static int cm_rep_handler(struct cm_work *work)
static int cm_establish_handler(struct cm_work *work)
{
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
- int ret;
/* See comment in cm_establish about lookup. */
cm_id_priv = cm_acquire_id(work->local_id, work->remote_id);
@@ -2552,15 +2573,7 @@ static int cm_establish_handler(struct cm_work *work)
}
ib_cancel_mad(cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent, cm_id_priv->msg);
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
out:
cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
@@ -2571,7 +2584,6 @@ static int cm_rtu_handler(struct cm_work *work)
{
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
struct cm_rtu_msg *rtu_msg;
- int ret;
rtu_msg = (struct cm_rtu_msg *)work->mad_recv_wc->recv_buf.mad;
cm_id_priv = cm_acquire_id(
@@ -2594,15 +2606,7 @@ static int cm_rtu_handler(struct cm_work *work)
cm_id_priv->id.state = IB_CM_ESTABLISHED;
ib_cancel_mad(cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent, cm_id_priv->msg);
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
out:
cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
@@ -2795,7 +2799,6 @@ static int cm_dreq_handler(struct cm_work *work)
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
struct cm_dreq_msg *dreq_msg;
struct ib_mad_send_buf *msg = NULL;
- int ret;
dreq_msg = (struct cm_dreq_msg *)work->mad_recv_wc->recv_buf.mad;
cm_id_priv = cm_acquire_id(
@@ -2860,15 +2863,7 @@ static int cm_dreq_handler(struct cm_work *work)
}
cm_id_priv->id.state = IB_CM_DREQ_RCVD;
cm_id_priv->tid = dreq_msg->hdr.tid;
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
unlock: spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
@@ -2880,7 +2875,6 @@ static int cm_drep_handler(struct cm_work *work)
{
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
struct cm_drep_msg *drep_msg;
- int ret;
drep_msg = (struct cm_drep_msg *)work->mad_recv_wc->recv_buf.mad;
cm_id_priv = cm_acquire_id(
@@ -2901,15 +2895,7 @@ static int cm_drep_handler(struct cm_work *work)
cm_enter_timewait(cm_id_priv);
ib_cancel_mad(cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent, cm_id_priv->msg);
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
out:
cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
@@ -3037,7 +3023,6 @@ static int cm_rej_handler(struct cm_work *work)
{
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
struct cm_rej_msg *rej_msg;
- int ret;
rej_msg = (struct cm_rej_msg *)work->mad_recv_wc->recv_buf.mad;
cm_id_priv = cm_acquire_rejected_id(rej_msg);
@@ -3086,15 +3071,7 @@ static int cm_rej_handler(struct cm_work *work)
goto out;
}
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
out:
cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
@@ -3204,7 +3181,7 @@ static int cm_mra_handler(struct cm_work *work)
{
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
struct cm_mra_msg *mra_msg;
- int timeout, ret;
+ int timeout;
mra_msg = (struct cm_mra_msg *)work->mad_recv_wc->recv_buf.mad;
cm_id_priv = cm_acquire_mraed_id(mra_msg);
@@ -3264,15 +3241,7 @@ static int cm_mra_handler(struct cm_work *work)
cm_id_priv->msg->context[1] = (void *) (unsigned long)
cm_id_priv->id.state;
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
out:
spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
@@ -3407,15 +3376,7 @@ static int cm_lap_handler(struct cm_work *work)
cm_id_priv->id.lap_state = IB_CM_LAP_RCVD;
cm_id_priv->tid = lap_msg->hdr.tid;
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
unlock: spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
@@ -3427,7 +3388,6 @@ static int cm_apr_handler(struct cm_work *work)
{
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
struct cm_apr_msg *apr_msg;
- int ret;
/* Currently Alternate path messages are not supported for
* RoCE link layer.
@@ -3462,16 +3422,7 @@ static int cm_apr_handler(struct cm_work *work)
cm_id_priv->id.lap_state = IB_CM_LAP_IDLE;
ib_cancel_mad(cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent, cm_id_priv->msg);
cm_id_priv->msg = NULL;
-
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
out:
cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
@@ -3482,7 +3433,6 @@ static int cm_timewait_handler(struct cm_work *work)
{
struct cm_timewait_info *timewait_info;
struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
- int ret;
timewait_info = container_of(work, struct cm_timewait_info, work);
spin_lock_irq(&cm.lock);
@@ -3501,15 +3451,7 @@ static int cm_timewait_handler(struct cm_work *work)
goto out;
}
cm_id_priv->id.state = IB_CM_IDLE;
- ret = atomic_inc_and_test(&cm_id_priv->work_count);
- if (!ret)
- list_add_tail(&work->list, &cm_id_priv->work_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
-
- if (ret)
- cm_process_work(cm_id_priv, work);
- else
- cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
+ cm_queue_work_unlock(cm_id_priv, work);
return 0;
out:
cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-06 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 7:46 [PATCH rdma-next 00/10] Various clean ups to ib_cm Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:46 ` [PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA/addr: Mark addr_resolve as might_sleep() Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:46 ` [PATCH rdma-next 02/10] RDMA/cm: Remove return code from add_cm_id_to_port_list Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:46 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/10] RDMA/cm: Remove unused store to ret in cm_rej_handler Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:46 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-05-06 7:46 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/10] RDMA/cm: Pass the cm_id_private into cm_cleanup_timewait Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:46 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/10] RDMA/cm: Add a note explaining how the timewait is eventually freed Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:46 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/10] RDMA/cm: Make find_remote_id() return a cm_id_private Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:46 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/10] RDMA/cm: Remove the cm_free_id() wrapper function Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:47 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/10] RDMA/cm: Remove needless cm_id variable Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-06 7:47 ` [PATCH rdma-next 10/10] RDMA/cm: Increment the refcount inside cm_find_listen() Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 0:35 ` [PATCH rdma-next 00/10] Various clean ups to ib_cm Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200506074701.9775-5-leon@kernel.org \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).