From: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 04/14] RDMA/core: Allow to override device op
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 11:07:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526080751.GA182953@kheib-workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526055342.GP10591@unreal>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:53:42AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:21:25AM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:26:41AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:50:24PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
> > > >
> > > > Current device ops implementation allows only two stages "set"/"not set"
> > > > and requires caller to check if function pointer exists before
> > > > calling it.
> > > >
> > > > In order to simplify this repetitive task, let's give an option to
> > > > overwrite those pointers. This will allow us to set dummy functions
> > > > for the specific function pointers.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 9 ++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > index d9f565a779df..9486e60b42cc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > @@ -2542,11 +2542,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_get_net_dev_by_params);
> > > > void ib_set_device_ops(struct ib_device *dev, const struct ib_device_ops *ops)
> > > > {
> > > > struct ib_device_ops *dev_ops = &dev->ops;
> > > > -#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, name) \
> > > > - do { \
> > > > - if (ops->name) \
> > > > - if (!((ptr)->name)) \
> > > > - (ptr)->name = ops->name; \
> > > > +#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, name) \
> > > > + do { \
> > > > + if (ops->name) \
> > > > + (ptr)->name = ops->name; \
> > > > } while (0)
> > >
> > > Did you carefully check every driver to be sure it is OK with this?
> > >
> > > Maybe Kamal remembers why it was like this?
> > >
> > > Jason
> >
> > The idea was to set a specific op only once by the provider when there
> > is a valid function for the op, this was done to make sure that if
> > the op isn't supported by the provider then it will be set to NULL.
>
> This is not changed.
>
Well, This is changed in patch #6 as dummy functions are now allowed...,
Instead of setting NULL when the op isn't supported by the provider.
I'm wondering why allow only fill_res_entry() and fill_stat_entry() to
be a dummy function as there is multiple ops that can be dummy too,
and why this has to be in this patch set instead in a seperiate patch
set for all the ops that can be dummy?
Thanks,
Kamal
> >
> > I think it will be more cleaner from the provider point of view to
> > see which ops are supported or not supported in the provider code. by
> > overriding the ops in the core this will make things more confusing.
>
> Actually the patch does quite opposite, set defaults by IB/core and
> overwrite it by the provider later and not vice versa. The IB/core
> won't overwrite defined by the provider ops. From provider point of view
> no change.
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 9:50 [PATCH rdma-next 00/14] RAW format dumps through RDMAtool Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 01/14] net/mlx5: Export resource dump interface Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 15:25 ` Maor Gottlieb
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 02/14] net/mlx5: Add support in query QP, CQ and MKEY segments Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/14] RDMA/core: Fix double put of resource Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 04/14] RDMA/core: Allow to override device op Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:28 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 23:21 ` Kamal Heib
2020-05-26 5:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-26 8:07 ` Kamal Heib [this message]
2020-05-26 9:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/14] RDMA/core: Don't call fill_res_entry for PD Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/14] RDMA/core: Add restrack dummy ops Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:23 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/14] RDMA: Add dedicated MR resource tracker function Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/14] RDMA: Add a dedicated CQ " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/14] RDMA: Add a dedicated QP " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 10/14] RDMA: Add dedicated cm id " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 11/14] RDMA: Add support to dump resource tracker in RAW format Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-27 6:14 ` Maor Gottlieb
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 12/14] RDMA/mlx5: Add support to get QP resource in raw format Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 13/14] RDMA/mlx5: Add support to get CQ resource in RAW format Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13 9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 14/14] RDMA/mlx5: Add support to get MR " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-13 10:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next 00/14] RAW format dumps through RDMAtool Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200526080751.GA182953@kheib-workstation \
--to=kamalheib1@gmail.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).