linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 04/14] RDMA/core: Allow to override device op
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 11:07:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526080751.GA182953@kheib-workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526055342.GP10591@unreal>

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:53:42AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:21:25AM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:26:41AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:50:24PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
> > > >
> > > > Current device ops implementation allows only two stages "set"/"not set"
> > > > and requires caller to check if function pointer exists before
> > > > calling it.
> > > >
> > > > In order to simplify this repetitive task, let's give an option to
> > > > overwrite those pointers. This will allow us to set dummy functions
> > > > for the specific function pointers.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 9 ++++-----
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > index d9f565a779df..9486e60b42cc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > > @@ -2542,11 +2542,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_get_net_dev_by_params);
> > > >  void ib_set_device_ops(struct ib_device *dev, const struct ib_device_ops *ops)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct ib_device_ops *dev_ops = &dev->ops;
> > > > -#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, name)                                               \
> > > > -	do {                                                                   \
> > > > -		if (ops->name)                                                 \
> > > > -			if (!((ptr)->name))				       \
> > > > -				(ptr)->name = ops->name;                       \
> > > > +#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, name)					\
> > > > +	do {								\
> > > > +		if (ops->name)						\
> > > > +			(ptr)->name = ops->name;			\
> > > >  	} while (0)
> > >
> > > Did you carefully check every driver to be sure it is OK with this?
> > >
> > > Maybe Kamal remembers why it was like this?
> > >
> > > Jason
> >
> > The idea was to set a specific op only once by the provider when there
> > is a valid function for the op, this was done to make sure that if
> > the op isn't supported by the provider then it will be set to NULL.
> 
> This is not changed.
>

Well, This is changed in patch #6 as dummy functions are now allowed...,
Instead of setting NULL when the op isn't supported by the provider.

I'm wondering why allow only fill_res_entry() and fill_stat_entry() to
be a dummy function as there is multiple ops that can be dummy too,
and why this has to be in this patch set instead in a seperiate patch
set for all the ops that can be dummy? 

Thanks,
Kamal

> >
> > I think it will be more cleaner from the provider point of view to
> > see which ops are supported or not supported in the provider code. by
> > overriding the ops in the core this will make things more confusing.
> 
> Actually the patch does quite opposite, set defaults by IB/core and
> overwrite it by the provider later and not vice versa. The IB/core
> won't overwrite defined by the provider ops. From provider point of view
> no change.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kamal

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13  9:50 [PATCH rdma-next 00/14] RAW format dumps through RDMAtool Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 01/14] net/mlx5: Export resource dump interface Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 15:25     ` Maor Gottlieb
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 02/14] net/mlx5: Add support in query QP, CQ and MKEY segments Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/14] RDMA/core: Fix double put of resource Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 04/14] RDMA/core: Allow to override device op Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:26   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:28     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 23:21     ` Kamal Heib
2020-05-26  5:53       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-26  8:07         ` Kamal Heib [this message]
2020-05-26  9:44           ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/14] RDMA/core: Don't call fill_res_entry for PD Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/14] RDMA/core: Add restrack dummy ops Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:23     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/14] RDMA: Add dedicated MR resource tracker function Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/14] RDMA: Add a dedicated CQ " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/14] RDMA: Add a dedicated QP " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:34   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:26     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 10/14] RDMA: Add dedicated cm id " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 11/14] RDMA: Add support to dump resource tracker in RAW format Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 16:21     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-27  6:14       ` Maor Gottlieb
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 12/14] RDMA/mlx5: Add support to get QP resource in raw format Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 13/14] RDMA/mlx5: Add support to get CQ resource in RAW format Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-13  9:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next 14/14] RDMA/mlx5: Add support to get MR " Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 14:50   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-13 10:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next 00/14] RAW format dumps through RDMAtool Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526080751.GA182953@kheib-workstation \
    --to=kamalheib1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).