From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Cc: <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Bob Pearson <rpearson@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v5 10/12] rdma_rxe: Fix pool related bugs
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:49:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918234921.GI3699@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200918211517.5295-11-rpearson@hpe.com>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:15:15PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
> This patch does following:
> - Replace the rwlock used for pool->pool_lock by a spinlock.
> Rwlock is a multi-reader single writer lock but there are
> cases where a multi-writer lock is required, especially where
> multiple objects can be created at the same time.
Not sure what a multi-write lock is, sounds scary
> - Be more careful about type checking in pool APIs.
> Originally each object used in rxe had a pool_entry struct as
> the first member of it's struct. Since then about half have
> it first and the other half have it later in the struct. The
> pool APIs used void * as a hack to avoid type checking. This
> patch changes the APIs so the pool_entry struct is position
> independent. When used a parameter a macro is used to convert
> the object pointer to the entry pointer. The offset of the entry
> is stored for each pool and used to convert the entry address to
> the object address.
> - Provide locked and unlocked versions of the APIs.
> The current code uses a lock in each API to allow atomic
> updates to the pools. But some uses fail to work because they
> combined multiple pool operations and expect them to be
> atomic. As an example doing a lookup to see if a matching object
> exists for a multicast group followed by a create of a new group
> if it does not. By letting the caller take the pool lock and then
> combine unlocked operations this problem is fixed.
> - Replace calls to pool APIs with the typesafe versions.
> - Replaced a few calls to pr_warn with pr_err_once.
This probably needs to be split up
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-18 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 21:15 [PATCH for-next v5 00/12] rdma_rxe: API extensions Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 01/12] rdma_rxe: Separat MEM into MR and MW objects Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 02/12] rdma_rxe: Enable " Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 03/12] rdma_rxe: Let pools support both keys and indices Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 04/12] rdma_rxe: Add alloc_mw and dealloc_mw verbs Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 05/12] rdma_rxe: Add bind_mw and invalidate_mw verbs Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 06/12] rdma_rxe: Add memory access through MWs Bob Pearson
2020-09-19 3:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 07/12] rdma_rxe: Add support for ibv_query_device_ex Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 08/12] rdma_rxe: Add support for extended CQ operations Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 09/12] rdma_rxe: Add support for extended QP operations Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 10/12] rdma_rxe: Fix pool related bugs Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 23:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 11/12] rdma_rxe: Fix mcast group allocation bug Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 21:15 ` [PATCH for-next v5 12/12] rdma_rxe: Fix bugs in the multicast receive path Bob Pearson
2020-09-18 23:51 ` [PATCH for-next v5 00/12] rdma_rxe: API extensions Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-19 8:44 ` Zhu Yanjun
2020-09-19 8:46 ` Zhu Yanjun
2020-09-20 21:13 ` Bob Pearson
2020-09-21 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200918234921.GI3699@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearson@hpe.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).