linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 06/10] RDMA/mlx4: Prepare QP allocation to remove from the driver
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:47:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929124731.GH3094@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926102450.2966017-7-leon@kernel.org>

On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 01:24:46PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> Since all mlx4 QP have same storage type, move the QP allocation to be
> in one place. This change is preparation to removal of such allocation
> from the driver.
>
> Reviewed-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c | 156 +++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

Unfortunately, this patch needs small fixup.

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c
index ef52dd21acd9..c32af16e2564 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/qp.c
@@ -1354,7 +1354,6 @@ static void destroy_qp_rss(struct mlx4_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx4_ib_qp *qp)
 	mlx4_qp_free(dev->dev, &qp->mqp);
 	mlx4_qp_release_range(dev->dev, qp->mqp.qpn, 1);
 	del_gid_entries(qp);
-	kfree(qp->rss_ctx);
 }

 static void destroy_qp_common(struct mlx4_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx4_ib_qp *qp,
--
2.26.2


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-26 10:24 [PATCH rdma-next v1 00/10] Prepare drivers to move QP allocation to ib_core Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 01/10] RDMA/mlx5: Embed GSI QP into general mlx5_ib QP Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 02/10] RDMA/mlx5: Reuse existing fields in parent QP storage object Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 03/10] RDMA/mlx5: Change GSI QP to have same creation flow like other QPs Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 04/10] RDMA/mlx5: Delete not needed GSI QP signal QP type Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 05/10] RDMA/mlx4: Embed GSI QP into general mlx4_ib QP Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 06/10] RDMA/mlx4: Prepare QP allocation to remove from the driver Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-29 12:47   ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 07/10] RDMA/core: Align write and ioctl checks of QP types Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 08/10] RDMA/drivers: Remove udata check from special QP Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 09/10] RDMA/mthca: Combine special QP struct with mthca QP Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-26 10:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 10/10] RDMA/i40iw: Remove intermediate pointer that points to the same struct Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-29 16:45 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 00/10] Prepare drivers to move QP allocation to ib_core Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200929124731.GH3094@unreal \
    --to=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).