Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Add ancillary bus support
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:32:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201001083229.GV3094@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001050534.890666-2-david.m.ertman@intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:05:29PM -0700, Dave Ertman wrote:
> Add support for the Ancillary Bus, ancillary_device and ancillary_driver.
> It enables drivers to create an ancillary_device and bind an
> ancillary_driver to it.
>
> The bus supports probe/remove shutdown and suspend/resume callbacks.
> Each ancillary_device has a unique string based id; driver binds to
> an ancillary_device based on this id through the bus.
>
> Co-developed-by: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Fred Oh <fred.oh@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fred Oh <fred.oh@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/driver-api/index.rst         |   1 +
>  drivers/bus/Kconfig                        |   3 +
>  drivers/bus/Makefile                       |   3 +
>  drivers/bus/ancillary.c                    | 191 +++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/ancillary_bus.h              |  58 ++++++
>  include/linux/mod_devicetable.h            |   8 +
>  scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c          |   3 +
>  scripts/mod/file2alias.c                   |   8 +
>  9 files changed, 505 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst
>  create mode 100644 drivers/bus/ancillary.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/ancillary_bus.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0a11979aa927
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +=============
> +Ancillary Bus
> +=============
> +
> +In some subsystems, the functionality of the core device (PCI/ACPI/other) is
> +too complex for a single device to be managed as a monolithic block or a part of
> +the functionality needs to be exposed to a different subsystem.  Splitting the
> +functionality into smaller orthogonal devices would make it easier to manage
> +data, power management and domain-specific interaction with the hardware. A key
> +requirement for such a split is that there is no dependency on a physical bus,
> +device, register accesses or regmap support. These individual devices split from
> +the core cannot live on the platform bus as they are not physical devices that
> +are controlled by DT/ACPI. The same argument applies for not using MFD in this
> +scenario as MFD relies on individual function devices being physical devices
> +that are DT enumerated.
> +
> +An example for this kind of requirement is the audio subsystem where a single
> +IP is handling multiple entities such as HDMI, Soundwire, local devices such as
> +mics/speakers etc. The split for the core's functionality can be arbitrary or
> +be defined by the DSP firmware topology and include hooks for test/debug. This
> +allows for the audio core device to be minimal and focused on hardware-specific
> +control and communication.
> +
> +The ancillary bus is intended to be minimal, generic and avoid domain-specific
> +assumptions. Each ancillary_device represents a part of its parent
> +functionality. The generic behavior can be extended and specialized as needed
> +by encapsulating an ancillary_device within other domain-specific structures and
> +the use of .ops callbacks. Devices on the ancillary bus do not share any
> +structures and the use of a communication channel with the parent is
> +domain-specific.
> +
> +When Should the Ancillary Bus Be Used
> +=====================================
> +
> +The ancillary bus is to be used when a driver and one or more kernel modules,
> +who share a common header file with the driver, need a mechanism to connect and
> +provide access to a shared object allocated by the ancillary_device's
> +registering driver.  The registering driver for the ancillary_device(s) and the
> +kernel module(s) registering ancillary_drivers can be from the same subsystem,
> +or from multiple subsystems.
> +
> +The emphasis here is on a common generic interface that keeps subsystem
> +customization out of the bus infrastructure.
> +
> +One example could be a multi-port PCI network device that is rdma-capable and
> +needs to export this functionality and attach to an rdma driver in another
> +subsystem.  The PCI driver will allocate and register an ancillary_device for
> +each physical function on the NIC.  The rdma driver will register an
> +ancillary_driver that will be matched with and probed for each of these
> +ancillary_devices.  This will give the rdma driver access to the shared data/ops
> +in the PCI drivers shared object to establish a connection with the PCI driver.
> +
> +Another use case is for the a PCI device to be split out into multiple sub
> +functions.  For each sub function an ancillary_device will be created.  A PCI
> +sub function driver will bind to such devices that will create its own one or
> +more class devices.  A PCI sub function ancillary device will likely be
> +contained in a struct with additional attributes such as user defined sub
> +function number and optional attributes such as resources and a link to the
> +parent device.  These attributes could be used by systemd/udev; and hence should
> +be initialized before a driver binds to an ancillary_device.
> +
> +Ancillary Device
> +================
> +
> +An ancillary_device is created and registered to represent a part of its parent
> +device's functionality. It is given a name that, combined with the registering
> +drivers KBUILD_MODNAME, creates a match_name that is used for driver binding,
> +and an id that combined with the match_name provide a unique name to register
> +with the bus subsystem.
> +
> +Registering an ancillary_device is a two-step process.  First you must call
> +ancillary_device_initialize(), which will check several aspects of the
> +ancillary_device struct and perform a device_initialize().  After this step
> +completes, any error state must have a call to put_device() in its resolution
> +path.  The second step in registering an ancillary_device is to perform a call
> +to ancillary_device_add(), which will set the name of the device and add the
> +device to the bus.
> +
> +To unregister an ancillary_device, just a call to ancillary_device_unregister()
> +is used.  This will perform both a device_del() and a put_device().

Why did you chose ancillary_device_initialize() and not
ancillary_device_register() to be paired with ancillary_device_unregister()?

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01  5:05 [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] Add ancillary bus support Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  8:32   ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-10-01 17:20     ` Ertman, David M
2020-10-01 17:40       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-01 18:29         ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-01 19:32           ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02  5:29             ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-02  6:20               ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02  8:42                 ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-02 11:13                   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02 11:27                     ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-02 11:45                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02 11:56                         ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ASoC: SOF: Introduce descriptors for SOF client Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: SOF: Create client driver for IPC test Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ASoC: SOF: ops: Add ops for client registration Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Define " Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: SOF: debug: Remove IPC flood test support in SOF core Dave Ertman
2020-10-03  9:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-03  9:10   ` Greg KH
2020-10-03  9:24     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-03  9:32       ` Greg KH
2020-10-05  1:20     ` Ertman, David M

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201001083229.GV3094@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox