Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] Add auxiliary bus support

Leon Romanovsky
2020-11-05T19:30:16Z

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 09:12:51AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:47 AM Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 01:19:09AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > Some doc fixups, and minor code feedback. Otherwise looks good to me.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:35 PM Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > > >
> > > > +config AUXILIARY_BUS
> > > > + bool
> > >
> > > tristate? Unless you need non-exported symbols, might as well let this
> > > be a module.
> >
> > I asked it to be "bool", because bus as a module is an invitation for
> > a disaster. For example if I compile-in mlx5 which is based on this bus,
> > and won't add auxiliary_bus as a module to initramfs, the system won't boot.
>
> Something is broken if module dependencies don't arrange for
> auxiliary_bus.ko to be added to the initramfs automatically, but yes,
> it is another degree of freedom for something to go wrong if you build
> the initramfs by hand.

And this is something that I would like to avoid for now.

>
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > >
> > > Per above SPDX is v2 only, so...
> >
> > Isn't it default for the Linux kernel?
>
> SPDX eliminated the need to guess a default, and MODULE_LICENSE("GPL")
> implies the "or later" language. The only default assumption is that
> the license is GPL v2 compatible, those possibilities are myriad, but
> v2-only is the first preference.

I mean that plain GPL == GPL v2 in the kernel.

Thanks