From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@openeuler.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 2/5] RDMA/hns: Reorganize hns_roce_create_cq()
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:40:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326144016.GA844532@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1615972183-42510-3-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:09:40PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
> From: Yixing Liu <liuyixing1@huawei.com>
>
> Encapsulate two subprocesses into functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yixing Liu <liuyixing1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cq.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cq.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cq.c
> index 74fc494..467caa9 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cq.c
> @@ -276,6 +276,58 @@ static void free_cq_db(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_cq *hr_cq,
> }
> }
>
> +static int verify_cq_create_attr(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> + const struct ib_cq_init_attr *attr)
> +{
> + struct ib_device *ibdev = &hr_dev->ib_dev;
> +
> + if (!attr->cqe || attr->cqe > hr_dev->caps.max_cqes) {
> + ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to check CQ count %u, max = %u.\n",
> + attr->cqe, hr_dev->caps.max_cqes);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (attr->comp_vector >= hr_dev->caps.num_comp_vectors) {
> + ibdev_err(ibdev, "failed to check CQ vector = %u, max = %d.\n",
> + attr->comp_vector, hr_dev->caps.num_comp_vectors);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_cq_ucmd(struct hns_roce_cq *hr_cq, struct ib_udata *udata,
> + struct hns_roce_ib_create_cq *ucmd)
> +{
> + struct ib_device *ibdev = hr_cq->ib_cq.device;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = ib_copy_from_udata(ucmd, udata, min(udata->inlen,
> + sizeof(*ucmd)));
Is this leading up to something? Wrapping one function in another is
getting a bit silly
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-26 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 9:09 [PATCH for-next 0/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor and reorganization Weihang Li
2021-03-17 9:09 ` [PATCH for-next 1/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_v2_poll_one() Weihang Li
2021-03-17 9:09 ` [PATCH for-next 2/5] RDMA/hns: Reorganize hns_roce_create_cq() Weihang Li
2021-03-26 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-03-27 1:29 ` liweihang
2021-03-17 9:09 ` [PATCH for-next 3/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor reset state checking flow Weihang Li
2021-03-17 9:09 ` [PATCH for-next 4/5] RDMA/hns: Reorganize process of setting HEM Weihang Li
2021-03-17 9:09 ` [PATCH for-next 5/5] RDMA/hns: Simplify command fields for HEM base address configuration Weihang Li
2021-03-26 14:47 ` [PATCH for-next 0/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor and reorganization Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-27 1:40 ` liweihang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210326144016.GA844532@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox