Re: [PATCH for-next v2] RDMA/rxe: Split MEM into MR and MW

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:24:26PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
> In the original rxe implementation it was intended to use a common
> object to represent MRs and MWs but they are different enough to
> separate these into two objects.
> 
> This allows replacing the mem name with mr for MRs which is more
> consistent with the style for the other objects and less likely
> to be confusing. This is a long patch that mostly changes mem to
> mr where it makes sense and adds a new rxe_mw struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearson@hpe.com>
> Acked-by: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  v1 of this patch included some fields in the new rxe_mw struct
>  which were not yet needed. They are removed in v2.
>  This patch includes changes needed to address the fact that
>  the ib_mw struct is now being allocated in rdma/core.

Applied to for-next

I touched it with clang-format first though, lots of little whitespace
issues

Thanks,
Jason