From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-next 0/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor and reorganization
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:14:02 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210401191402.GB1672136@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1616815294-13434-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:21:29AM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
> Refactor the process of polling CQ and several control paths in the hns
> driver.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Avoid wrapping a function in another one.
> - Make a rebase.
> - Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1615972183-42510-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
>
> P.S. This version is made based on "RDMA/hns: Support to select congestion
> control algorithm" at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1616679236-7795-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
> Sorry for just finding out there's merge conflict between these two series,
> I will send a new version ASAP if something needs to be updated.
>
> Weihang Li (1):
> RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_v2_poll_one()
>
> Xi Wang (3):
> RDMA/hns: Refactor reset state checking flow
> RDMA/hns: Reorganize process of setting HEM
> RDMA/hns: Simplify command fields for HEM base address configuration
>
> Yixing Liu (1):
> RDMA/hns: Reorganize hns_roce_create_cq()
Applied to for-next, thanks
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-01 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-27 3:21 [PATCH v2 for-next 0/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor and reorganization Weihang Li
2021-03-27 3:21 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 1/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor hns_roce_v2_poll_one() Weihang Li
2021-03-27 3:21 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 2/5] RDMA/hns: Reorganize hns_roce_create_cq() Weihang Li
2021-03-27 3:21 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 3/5] RDMA/hns: Refactor reset state checking flow Weihang Li
2021-03-27 3:21 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 4/5] RDMA/hns: Reorganize process of setting HEM Weihang Li
2021-03-27 3:21 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 5/5] RDMA/hns: Simplify command fields for HEM base address configuration Weihang Li
2021-04-01 19:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210401191402.GB1672136@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox