From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc] IB/cma: Fix false P_Key mismatch messages
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 16:12:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210510191249.GF1002214@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0356652-53D1-4B24-8A8D-4D1D8BE09F6F@oracle.com>
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:52:54PM +0000, Haakon Bugge wrote:
>
>
> > On 10 May 2021, at 19:04, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 02:54:01PM +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> >> There are three conditions that must be fulfilled in order to consider
> >> a partition match. Those are:
> >>
> >> 1. Both P_Keys must valid
> >> 2. At least one must be a full member
> >> 3. The partitions (lower 15 bits) must match
> >>
> >> In system employing both limited and full membership ports, we see
> >> these false warning messages:
> >>
> >> RDMA CMA: got different BTH P_Key (0x2a00) and primary path P_Key (0xaa00)
> >> RDMA CMA: in the future this may cause the request to be dropped
> >>
> >> even though the partition is the same.
> >>
> >> See IBTA 10.9.1.2 Special P_Keys and 10.9.3 Partition Key Matching for
> >> a reference.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 84424a7fc793 ("IB/cma: Print warning on different inner and header P_Keys")
> >> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
> >> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > What is this trying to fix?
>
> The false warning messages. The wrong way though:-)
>
> > IMHO it is a bug on the sender side to send GMPs to use a pkey that
> > doesn't exactly match the data path pkey.
>
> The active connector calls ib_addr_get_pkey(). This function
> extracts the pkey from byte 8/9 in the device's bcast
> address. However, RFC 4391 explicitly states:
pkeys in CM come only from path records that the SM returns, the above
should only be used to feed into a path record query which could then
return back a limited pkey.
Everything thereafter should use the SM's version of the pkey.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-05 12:54 [PATCH for-rc] IB/cma: Fix false P_Key mismatch messages Håkon Bugge
2021-05-10 17:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-10 18:52 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-05-10 19:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-06-29 13:45 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-07-05 16:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-05 16:59 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-07-08 15:59 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-07-08 18:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-09 16:45 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-07-09 16:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210510191249.GF1002214@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=haakon.bugge@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).