From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>, dledford@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, leon@kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
Lang Cheng <chenglang@huawei.com>,
Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 2/6] RDMA/hns: Use new interface to modify QP context
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 02:47:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202105300258.D547Ag2T-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1622281154-49867-3-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7911 bytes --]
Hi Weihang,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on rdma/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.13-rc3 next-20210528]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Weihang-Li/RDMA-hns-Use-new-interfaces-to-write-read-fields/20210529-174115
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git for-next
config: riscv-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/da77d9680e6740ea2a18ee9b55bf268c3ce03594
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Weihang-Li/RDMA-hns-Use-new-interfaces-to-write-read-fields/20210529-174115
git checkout da77d9680e6740ea2a18ee9b55bf268c3ce03594
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=riscv
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:5,
from arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:10,
from include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:7,
from arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h:202,
from include/linux/bitops.h:32,
from include/linux/of.h:15,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:33:
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c: In function 'modify_qp_init_to_rtr':
>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_1524' declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
328 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:33:51: note: in definition of macro '__cpu_to_le32'
33 | #define __cpu_to_le32(x) ((__force __le32)(__u32)(x))
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:316:2: note: in expansion of macro '__compiletime_assert'
316 | __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
328 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bitfield.h:49:3: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
49 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ? \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bitfield.h:94:3: note: in expansion of macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
94 | __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: "); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h:83:52: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_PREP'
83 | *((__le32 *)ptr + (field_h) / 32) |= cpu_to_le32(FIELD_PREP( \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h:87:39: note: in expansion of macro '_hr_reg_write'
87 | #define hr_reg_write(ptr, field, val) _hr_reg_write(ptr, field, val)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:4370:2: note: in expansion of macro 'hr_reg_write'
4370 | hr_reg_write(context, QPC_LP_PKTN_INI, lp_pktn_ini);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_1531' declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
328 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:33:51: note: in definition of macro '__cpu_to_le32'
33 | #define __cpu_to_le32(x) ((__force __le32)(__u32)(x))
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:316:2: note: in expansion of macro '__compiletime_assert'
316 | __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
328 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bitfield.h:49:3: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
49 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ? \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bitfield.h:94:3: note: in expansion of macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
94 | __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: "); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h:83:52: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_PREP'
83 | *((__le32 *)ptr + (field_h) / 32) |= cpu_to_le32(FIELD_PREP( \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h:87:39: note: in expansion of macro '_hr_reg_write'
87 | #define hr_reg_write(ptr, field, val) _hr_reg_write(ptr, field, val)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:4374:2: note: in expansion of macro 'hr_reg_write'
4374 | hr_reg_write(context, QPC_ACK_REQ_FREQ, lp_pktn_ini);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/__compiletime_assert_1524 +328 include/linux/compiler_types.h
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 314
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 315 #define _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 316 __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 317
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 318 /**
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 319 * compiletime_assert - break build and emit msg if condition is false
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 320 * @condition: a compile-time constant condition to check
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 321 * @msg: a message to emit if condition is false
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 322 *
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 323 * In tradition of POSIX assert, this macro will break the build if the
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 324 * supplied condition is *false*, emitting the supplied error message if the
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 325 * compiler has support to do so.
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 326 */
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 327 #define compiletime_assert(condition, msg) \
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 @328 _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 329
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 69602 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-29 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-29 9:39 [PATCH for-next 0/6] RDMA/hns: Use new interfaces to write/read fields Weihang Li
2021-05-29 9:39 ` [PATCH for-next 1/6] RDMA/hns: Use new interface to write CQ context Weihang Li
2021-05-29 9:39 ` [PATCH for-next 2/6] RDMA/hns: Use new interface to modify QP context Weihang Li
2021-05-29 18:47 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-05-29 9:39 ` [PATCH for-next 3/6] RDMA/hns: Use new interface to get CQE fields Weihang Li
2021-05-29 9:39 ` [PATCH for-next 4/6] RDMA/hns: Use new interface to write FRMR fields Weihang Li
2021-05-29 9:39 ` [PATCH for-next 5/6] RDMA/hns: Use new interface to write DB related fields Weihang Li
[not found] ` <6e3b1d94-fb36-01f2-7c9b-4cc8e7a85921@huawei.com>
2021-05-31 2:04 ` liweihang
2021-05-29 9:39 ` [PATCH for-next 6/6] RDMA/hns: Clean SRQC structure definition Weihang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202105300258.D547Ag2T-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=chenglang@huawei.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox