From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 for-next 00/12] RDMA: Use refcount_t for reference counting
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:08:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608180848.GA981825@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1622194663-2383-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:37:31PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
> There are some refcnt in type of atomic_t in RDMA subsystem, almost all of
> them is wrote before the refcount_t is acheived in kernel. refcount_t is
> better than integer for reference counting, it will WARN on
> overflow/underflow and avoid use-after-free risks.
>
> Changes since v3:
> * Drop the rdmavt patch because the refcount_t is not suitable for the
> logic.
> * Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1621925504-33019-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Drop i40iw related parts because this driver will be removed soon.
> * Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1621590825-60693-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Split these patches by variable granularity.
> * Fix a warning on refcount of struct mcast_group.
> * Add a patch on rdmavt.
> * Drop "RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t APIs for HEM".
> * Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1620958299-4869-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
>
>
> Weihang Li (12):
> RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
> iwcm_id_private
> RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
> iwpm_admin_data
> RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
> ib_mad_snoop_private
> RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
> mcast_member
> RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
> mcast_port
> RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
> ib_uverbs_device
> RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for CQ reference counting
> RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for SRQ reference
> counting
> RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for QP reference counting
> RDMA/cxgb4: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for reference counting
> RDMA/ipoib: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for reference counting
Applied to for-next, thanks
> RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of
> mcast_group
This one needs to be resent
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 9:37 [PATCH v4 for-next 00/12] RDMA: Use refcount_t for reference counting Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 01/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwcm_id_private Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 02/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwpm_admin_data Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 03/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_mad_snoop_private Weihang Li
2021-06-08 18:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 3:27 ` liweihang
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 04/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_member Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 05/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_port Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 06/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_group Weihang Li
2021-06-08 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 3:45 ` liweihang
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 07/12] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_uverbs_device Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 08/12] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for CQ reference counting Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 09/12] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for SRQ " Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 10/12] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for QP " Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 11/12] RDMA/cxgb4: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for " Weihang Li
2021-05-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 for-next 12/12] RDMA/ipoib: " Weihang Li
2021-06-08 18:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210608180848.GA981825@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox