From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980CFC07E9B for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834D66198A for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240355AbhGFMcE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:32:04 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33310 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242139AbhGFMZq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:25:46 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id E648F68BEB; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:23:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:23:03 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Oded Gabbay , Oded Gabbay , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Gal Pressman , sleybo@amazon.com, Maling list - DRI developers , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma , Linux Media Mailing List , Doug Ledford , Dave Airlie , Alex Deucher , Leon Romanovsky , Christoph Hellwig , amd-gfx list , "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Add p2p via dmabuf to habanalabs Message-ID: <20210706122303.GB18273@lst.de> References: <20210705130314.11519-1-ogabbay@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Afaik linux cpu arch ports are also not accepted if there's no open > gcc or llvm port around, because without that the overall stack just > becomes useless. Yes. And the one architecture that has an open but not upstream compiler already is more than enough of a pain to not repeat that mistake ever again.