From: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
To: jgg@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com,
jhack@hpe.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>, Ian Ziemba <ian.ziemba@hpe.com>
Subject: [PATCH for-next v3 08/13] RDMA/rxe: Implement disable/enable_task()
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 22:10:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221029031009.64467-9-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221029031009.64467-1-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Implement common disable_task() and enable_task() routines by
adding a new PAUSED state to the do_task() state machine.
These replace tasklet_disable and tasklet_enable with code that
can be shared with all the task types. Move rxe_sched_task to
re-schedule the task outside of the locks to avoid a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Ian Ziemba <ian.ziemba@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
index 120693c9a795..d824de82f2ae 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
@@ -6,36 +6,46 @@
#include "rxe.h"
-/*
- * this locking is due to a potential race where
- * a second caller finds the task already running
- * but looks just after the last call to func
- */
-static void do_task(struct rxe_task *task)
+static bool task_is_idle(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- unsigned int iterations = RXE_MAX_ITERATIONS;
- int cont;
- int ret;
+ if (task->destroyed)
+ return false;
spin_lock_bh(&task->lock);
switch (task->state) {
case TASK_STATE_START:
task->state = TASK_STATE_BUSY;
spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
- break;
-
+ return true;
case TASK_STATE_BUSY:
task->state = TASK_STATE_ARMED;
fallthrough;
case TASK_STATE_ARMED:
- spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
- return;
-
+ case TASK_STATE_PAUSED:
+ break;
default:
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ break;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void do_task(struct rxe_task *task)
+{
+ unsigned int iterations = RXE_MAX_ITERATIONS;
+ bool resched = false;
+ int cont;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* flush out pending tasks */
+ spin_lock_bh(&task->lock);
+ if (task->state == TASK_STATE_PAUSED) {
spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
- pr_warn("%s failed with bad state %d\n", __func__, task->state);
return;
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
do {
cont = 0;
@@ -43,47 +53,52 @@ static void do_task(struct rxe_task *task)
spin_lock_bh(&task->lock);
switch (task->state) {
+ case TASK_STATE_START:
case TASK_STATE_BUSY:
if (ret) {
task->state = TASK_STATE_START;
- } else if (iterations--) {
+ } else if (task->type == RXE_TASK_TYPE_INLINE ||
+ iterations--) {
cont = 1;
} else {
- /* reschedule the tasklet and exit
- * the loop to give up the cpu
- */
- tasklet_schedule(&task->tasklet);
task->state = TASK_STATE_START;
+ resched = true;
}
break;
-
- /* someone tried to run the task since the last time we called
- * func, so we will call one more time regardless of the
- * return value
- */
case TASK_STATE_ARMED:
task->state = TASK_STATE_BUSY;
cont = 1;
break;
-
+ case TASK_STATE_PAUSED:
+ break;
default:
- pr_warn("%s failed with bad state %d\n", __func__,
- task->state);
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ break;
}
spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
} while (cont);
+ if (resched)
+ rxe_sched_task(task);
+
task->ret = ret;
}
static void disable_task(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- /* todo */
+ spin_lock_bh(&task->lock);
+ task->state = TASK_STATE_PAUSED;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
}
static void enable_task(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- /* todo */
+ spin_lock_bh(&task->lock);
+ task->state = TASK_STATE_START;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
+
+ /* restart task in case */
+ rxe_run_task(task);
}
/* busy wait until any previous tasks are done */
@@ -95,7 +110,8 @@ static void cleanup_task(struct rxe_task *task)
do {
spin_lock_bh(&task->lock);
- idle = (task->state == TASK_STATE_START);
+ idle = (task->state == TASK_STATE_START ||
+ task->state == TASK_STATE_PAUSED);
spin_unlock_bh(&task->lock);
} while (!idle);
}
@@ -103,22 +119,26 @@ static void cleanup_task(struct rxe_task *task)
/* silently treat schedule as inline for inline tasks */
static void inline_sched(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- do_task(task);
+ if (task_is_idle(task))
+ do_task(task);
}
static void inline_run(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- do_task(task);
+ if (task_is_idle(task))
+ do_task(task);
}
static void inline_disable(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- disable_task(task);
+ if (!task->destroyed)
+ disable_task(task);
}
static void inline_enable(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- enable_task(task);
+ if (!task->destroyed)
+ enable_task(task);
}
static void inline_cleanup(struct rxe_task *task)
@@ -142,31 +162,34 @@ static void inline_init(struct rxe_task *task)
/* use tsklet_xxx to avoid name collisions with tasklet_xxx */
static void tsklet_sched(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- tasklet_schedule(&task->tasklet);
+ if (task_is_idle(task))
+ tasklet_schedule(&task->tasklet);
}
static void tsklet_do_task(struct tasklet_struct *tasklet)
{
struct rxe_task *task = container_of(tasklet, typeof(*task), tasklet);
- do_task(task);
+ if (!task->destroyed)
+ do_task(task);
}
static void tsklet_run(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- do_task(task);
+ if (task_is_idle(task))
+ do_task(task);
}
static void tsklet_disable(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- disable_task(task);
- tasklet_disable(&task->tasklet);
+ if (!task->destroyed)
+ disable_task(task);
}
static void tsklet_enable(struct rxe_task *task)
{
- tasklet_enable(&task->tasklet);
- enable_task(task);
+ if (!task->destroyed)
+ enable_task(task);
}
static void tsklet_cleanup(struct rxe_task *task)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
index d594468fcf56..792832786456 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ enum {
TASK_STATE_START = 0,
TASK_STATE_BUSY = 1,
TASK_STATE_ARMED = 2,
+ TASK_STATE_PAUSED = 3,
};
/*
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-29 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-29 3:09 [PATCH for-next v3 00/13] Implement work queues for rdma_rxe Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 01/13] RDMA/rxe: Make task interface pluggable Bob Pearson
2022-11-11 2:28 ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-10-29 3:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 02/13] RDMA/rxe: Split rxe_drain_resp_pkts() Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 03/13] RDMA/rxe: Simplify reset state handling in rxe_resp.c Bob Pearson
2022-11-11 3:04 ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 04/13] RDMA/rxe: Handle qp error " Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] RDMA/rxe: Cleanup comp tasks in rxe_qp.c Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 06/13] RDMA/rxe: Remove __rxe_do_task() Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 07/13] RDMA/rxe: Make tasks schedule each other Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` Bob Pearson [this message]
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 09/13] RDMA/rxe: Replace TASK_STATE_START by TASK_STATE_IDLE Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 10/13] RDMA/rxe: Replace task->destroyed by task state INVALID Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 11/13] RDMA/rxe: Add workqueue support for tasks Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 12/13] RDMA/rxe: Make WORKQUEUE default for RC tasks Bob Pearson
2022-10-29 3:10 ` [PATCH for-next v3 13/13] RDMA/rxe: Remove tasklets from rxe_task.c Bob Pearson
2022-11-02 10:17 ` [PATCH for-next v3 00/13] Implement work queues for rdma_rxe Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
2022-11-02 11:20 ` Bob Pearson
2022-11-04 4:59 ` Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
2022-11-05 21:15 ` Bob Pearson
2022-11-07 8:21 ` Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
2022-11-07 16:06 ` Bob Pearson
2022-11-18 5:02 ` Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221029031009.64467-9-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--to=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=ian.ziemba@hpe.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhack@hpe.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).